From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 19:20:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5941065670 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:20:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from marvin.chruetertee.ch (marvin.chruetertee.ch [217.150.245.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA748FC19 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from daedalus.network.local (103-96.76-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.76.96.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by marvin.chruetertee.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37JKstL010120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:20:54 GMT (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4BBCDB1F.4060107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:21:03 +0200 From: Beat Gaetzi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <4BB08760.3090906@FreeBSD.org> <1270408368.32902.37.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1270408368.32902.37.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Updating security/nss X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:20:56 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:56 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote: >> The upcoming update of SeaMonkey to 2.0.4 requires a newer version of >> security/nss: >> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/seamonkey-2.0.4.log >> >> I've created a patch to update NSS to 3.12.6: >> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/nss-3126.patch >> >> With this version of NSS SeaMonkey 2.0.4 builds fine. I haven't done any >> further testing. I first want to ask if there are any plans for updating >> security/nss to a newer version? > > We do not yet have it in MC. I have no objection to this patch being > committed. I've run a test on a tinderbox with 8.0-STABLE i386 and tested the ports depending on security/nss with 3.12.6. Beside a build failure of ruby (which doesn't look related to nss) I couldn't found a problem: http://gecko.miwibox.org/index.php?action=list_buildports&build=8-FreeBSD_i386 Also the update to 3.12.6 does not include a shlib bump so I think there is no PORTREVISION bump of the depending ports needed. Does this update somehow interfere with the upcoming gnome update? Thanks, Beat