From owner-cvs-all Mon Mar 3 4: 7:11 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E14637B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 04:07:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672C343F3F; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 04:07:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h23C77vn024436; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:07:07 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.7/8.12.6/Submit) id h23C774Y024435; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:07:07 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:07:07 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5 Message-ID: <20030303120707.GA24280@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200303030509.h2359Ofb036507@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030303095422.GA20923@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303101518.GA8214@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303103819.GA22044@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303115011.GA8705@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030303115011.GA8705@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:50:11 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > It sounds like you're upset about the minpassword* features being > removed in the first place. In that case, you're complaining to > the wrong person; des removed these last April. If you convince > him to re-add them, I would be happy to replace the documentation. Removed from where? Could you please point me to specific commit or just to file I can browse CVS log? > So none of the documentation is allowed to refer to PAM because > you don't like it and you therefore don't want anyone to find it? You misinterpretate me. I mean that LOGIN_CAP have no relations to PAM and completely self-contained, so removing something from LOGIN_CAP because of PAM is wrong. The same way wrong to remove something, say, from libz or libm because of PAM. > Look, I'm not going to get into a flamewar about this single sentence: > > The minpasswordlen and minpasswordcase facilities for enforcing restric- > tions on password quality, which used to be supported by login.conf, have > been superseded by the pam_passwdqc(8) PAM module. This sentence is probably OK, but miss references to FreeBSD base utilities (because is not true for all other). Besides this single sentence I see whole ACCOUNTING LIMITS section removed in your commit. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message