Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:40:50 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: Thomas Burgess <wonslung@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plans for Logged/Journaled UFS Message-ID: <4B2ED222.4050304@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <deb820500912201428i39f739b6v7dcf7624840a2722@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091030223225.GI5120@datapipe.com> <4AEB6D79.5070703@feral.com> <4B2E0FA9.1050003@fsn.hu> <4B2E65FC.9070609@feral.com> <4B2E95AE.9040402@fsn.hu> <deb820500912201428i39f739b6v7dcf7624840a2722@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> end to end data integrity via checksums is great. > > Mandatory given how close disk densities are to random bit failure.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2ED222.4050304>