From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 02:00:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2792B106566B; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listlog2011@gmail.com) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C7E8FC15; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1H2020l056811; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:00:03 GMT (envelope-from listlog2011@gmail.com) Message-ID: <4F3DB4A0.2080904@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:00:00 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <4F3C2671.3090808__7697.00510795719$1329343207$gmane$org@freebsd.org> <4F3D3E2D.9090100@FreeBSD.org> <4F3D6FDD.9050808@freebsd.org> <4F3D89CD.9050309@freebsd.org> <4F3DA27A.3090903@freebsd.org> <4F3DB3AE.5000109@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3DB3AE.5000109@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Kabaev , threads@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable , David Xu , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: pthread_cond_timedwait() broken in 9-stable? [possible answer] X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidxu@freebsd.org List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:00:05 -0000 On 2012/2/17 9:55, Julian Elischer wrote: > > kern.timecounter.tick: 1 > kern.timecounter.choice: TSC-low(1000) i8254(0) HPET(950) > ACPI-fast(900) dummy(-1000000) > kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast > kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 > > switching the machine from TSC_low to ACPI-fast fixes the problem. > > in 8.x it used to default to ACPI > but I used to switch it to "TSC" to get better performance. > > I wonder why TSC-low is now bad to use.. > maybe the TSCs are not as well sychronised as they were in 8.x? > maybe the pthreads code didn't get the memo about changing timers? > pthread code does not know timer setting, same as other code in kernel. ;-)