Date: 07 Jul 2002 23:09:06 +0200 From: Jan Lentfer <Jan.Lentfer@web.de> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compaq-CC, the next steps.... Message-ID: <1026076146.2275.59.camel@jan-linnb.lan> In-Reply-To: <3D28AC0E.45B756B9@mindspring.com> References: <1026074590.2085.39.camel@jan-linnb.lan> <3D28AC0E.45B756B9@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Son, 2002-07-07 um 23.01 schrieb Terry Lambert: > If you wanted to build everything, one at a time, to see what could > be built, then all you'd have to do is set it in /etc/make.conf. 8-). I think that will get you into deep trouble unless you do in on a machine which is only ment for testing. I tried to compile libogg and libvorbis with the ccc - at first it looked really good an did install flawless. But when I then tried install ports depending on one of the libs (can't remember exactly which) I got errors because of missing .so's. So, some real testing will be needed. So far I have build and checked four ports (wget, emboss, mmosaic, rxvt) and they seem to work well. But only emboss seems to be worth it, since it has some pretty FP intensive programs. What ports are most worth compiling with ccc? Floating point intesive one are top priority, I guess - which would that be? Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1026076146.2275.59.camel>