Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:24:33 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Eriq Lamar <eqe@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc Message-ID: <20030930162433.GA28475@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <200309301152.05556.eqe@cox.net> References: <200309301152.05556.eqe@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote: > It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at > all. > The answer is probably "no". Of course, your vague statement about 4.9 not being stable makes it hard to judge whether 5.1 is a better choice than 4.9. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030930162433.GA28475>