Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:17:15 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: buildworld times Message-ID: <20040229231715.GB44015@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040229121938.H8264-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> References: <20040229213521.GA44015@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040229121938.H8264-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:21:18PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: > > > > Athlon64 3400+ (2.2 GHz), running 32-bit OS, no -j: 28m55.55s real > > > > > > That's pretty fast. I wonder how long does the make buildkernel > > > take. =) > > > > I don't have a time for that, I have the (non-j) times for: > > > > make kernel-depend: 44.75s real > > make kernel: 5m30.31s real Note these times are with a GENERIC kernel with only WITNESS removed. > Ah, forgot all about the 64 portion of the Athlon but I wonder, > with the current crop of processors from Intel P4C-3.4Ghz with dual > channel memory with the 875p chipset versus the Athlon64-FX, I wonder > which one is actually faster in terms of buildworld times. Athlon64-FX -- while the Intel 875p chipset may have a dual-channel memory controller, it is on the northbridge and not on the CPU. So the 875p-based system will have much higher memory latencies. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040229231715.GB44015>