From owner-freebsd-sparc Mon Feb 17 18: 6:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF0D37B401; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:06:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE5643FBF; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:06:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id F0CA7AE2AC; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:06:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 03:06:48 +0100 From: Maxime Henrion To: Mike Barcroft Cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Too early for posting 5.0-RELEASE uptime records? Message-ID: <20030218020648.GG60813@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030217205235.J74149@espresso.bsdmike.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030217205235.J74149@espresso.bsdmike.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Barcroft wrote: > > 8:58PM up 25 days, 2:16, 1 user, load averages: 1.01, 1.04, 1.02 > > This is the sparc64 tinderbox which has a constant load. Looks like > sparc64 will have no problem matching (beating?) i386 for production > quality. I already did 42 days uptime on my sparc64 box :-). This box was probably much less busy than the tinderbox one though. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message