Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:45:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>, Adam Laurie <adam@algroup.co.uk>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, greg@greg.rim.or.jp, sumikawa@FreeBSD.ORG, hetzels@westbend.net, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, winter@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache13-php4 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121042310.50194-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <20000412142920.A5417@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Dirk Froemberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:28:01AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Not as of Apache-SSL 1.40: DSO support has been added. > > Ah, that sounds good... > > So it would be possible to create a "mod_apache-ssl" (the name is just > an example) that is configured via apxs similar to the other mod_* > ports, i. e. depend on apache13? Would it conflict with mod_ssl or > could "mod_apache-ssl" and mod_ssl be installed both? > > If so apache13-ssl could be replaced by "mod_apache-ssl" and thus > fit into the new apache ports scheme. Thats really going to depend in what sort of patches apache-ssl requires you to make against apache13. If they are the same as the patches required by mod_ssl then it should be pretty straightforward to support 2 different SSL modules. If they are different but non-conflicting then I could see little real problem. If they are conflicting then I'm not sure how to resolve the problem. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121042310.50194-100000>