From owner-freebsd-security Tue Aug 17 17:27: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18D914EAA for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 17:26:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02765; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:25:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990817182449.0463c590@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 18:25:23 -0600 To: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Any work around for this FreeBSD bug/DoS ? In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990816203409.05989960@granite.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does it crash OpenBSD? Theo'd want to know. --Brett At 08:40 PM 8/16/99 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: >Is there any work around or coming fix for the 'testsockbuf.c' originally >reported by Marc Olzheim on Aug 9th ? Its only a matter >of time until some wannabe script kiddie uploads it to one of my servers >for his/her cgi-script. It crashes 2.2.x and 3.x servers reliably :-( I >sent a message to the security officer last week but havent heard anything >since then. > > ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message