From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 10:18:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C9637B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01E443F3F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:18:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GHHxM7049401; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:18:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200306161718.h5GHHxM7049401@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:17:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: ths@katjusha.de In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: qmail uses 100% cpu after FreeBSD-5.0 to 5.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:18:07 -0000 On 16 Jun, Thorsten Schroeder wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote: > >> > FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Thu Jun 5 19:29:29 CEST 2003 >> > >> > fifo_vnops.c: >> > >> > $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v 1.87 2003/06/01 06:24:32 truckman Exp $ > >> Try upgrading to 1.88 and applying this patch: >> >> Index: sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c,v >> retrieving revision 1.88 >> diff -u -r1.88 fifo_vnops.c >> --- sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c 13 Jun 2003 06:58:11 -0000 1.88 >> +++ sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c 16 Jun 2003 08:44:20 -0000 > [...] > > Yes! This seems to work fine :) > > qmail-send doesn't increase cpu usage after the first mail anymore. > > Thanks a lot, Thanks for doing the testing. I just committed this patch.