Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:40:07 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/games/glest Makefile
Message-ID:  <20060109154006.GA28859@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <op.s22rlfm99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References:  <200601022151.k02LpBte011594@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060108115121.GC7570@FreeBSD.org> <op.s22rlfm99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:51:21 -0600, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>  
> wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:51:11PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >>edwin       2006-01-02 21:51:11 UTC
> >>
> >>  FreeBSD ports repository
> >>
> >>  Modified files:
> >>    games/glest          Makefile
> >>  Log:
> >>  broken on 4.x, ignore on 4.x!
> >
> >I've been under impression that IGNORE should be used when software in
> >question builds, but fails to run properly for some reason.  If it does
> >not build, you should mark it BROKEN.  If it's inherently broken (i.e.,
> >contains architechture-specific non-portable code) then
> >NOT_FOR_ARCHS/ONLY_FOR_ARCHS should be used.
> 
> I submitted BROKEN, but he has changed it to IGNORE.

Whish is obviously wrong; you should have probably corrected him in a
polite manner.

> 
> >As a side note, IMHO if submitter has freewall login, (and mezz@ does
> >have it) one should use it instead of FQN in commit log.
> 
> I personal don't mind both, which I careless.

It's just my perfectionism after all.  ;-)

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060109154006.GA28859>