Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:03:49 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> To: swell.k@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE problem: slow single processor, realtime prio vs network stack Message-ID: <20080828040349.GA38869@duncan.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <86hc96t3dd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20080819025019.GA27997@duncan.reilly.home> <20080818215813.H952@desktop> <20080819134005.GA85664@duncan.reilly.home> <20080820214627.C30593@desktop> <20080827233831.GA16705@duncan.reilly.home> <86hc96t3dd.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:00:46AM +0400, swell.k@gmail.com wrote: > Just curious, have you tried setting dev.pcm.%d.polling to `1'? > > from the sound(4): > Experimental polling mode support where > the driver operates by querying the > device state on each tick using a > callout(9) mechanism. Disabled by > default and currently only available > for a few device drivers. I'm using the 4front-tech oss driver, rather than the native one. I need all of the channels on my M-Audio Delta1010 sample synchronous, and the native driver seems to be limited to channel pairs... > Or turning on network driver polling(4)? Or even both? > Does it make any difference? Haven't tried it. Could do, I suppose. Will try. Cheers, Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080828040349.GA38869>