From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr  6 18:56:30 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C085137B62A
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  6 Apr 2000 18:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA92728;
	Thu, 6 Apr 2000 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200004070156.SAA92728@apollo.backplane.com>
To: Gustavo V G C Rios <kernel@lince.tdnet.com.br>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ?
References:  <38ED128C.22C3AA28@tdnet.com.br>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

:Considering the current kernel design approach used by traditional
:system, what happens if a drive were wrongly coded ?
:
:Would the entiry system crash ?

    Yes.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message