From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 23 18:31:12 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA22639 for current-outgoing; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 18:31:12 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA22633 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 18:31:09 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA17222; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 18:30:40 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199507240130.SAA17222@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: New options for lastcomm(1) To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 18:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Cc: current@freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de In-Reply-To: <199507231009.MAA01071@localhost> from "Wolfram Schneider" at Jul 23, 95 12:09:09 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 889 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > J. Wunsch writes: > >As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >> > >> > The additions would make sense for me. > >> > >> Find someone running accounting to review your ``cleanedup'' diff > >> and I am all for addeded functionality to lastcomm as a 2 mintue > >> read of the current lastcomm man pages shows it to be seriously > >> lacking in functionality of just what data it can produce :-(. > > > >So who is running accounting? (Or can someone explain me in a > >nutshell what i'd have to setup? I'd try it myself, even though i > >cannot bill someone, it's at least interesting. ;-) > > I use accounting as poor man's (k)trace, for debugging and > optimization of shell/perl scripts. Why do that when we have ktrace in FreeBSD??? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD