Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:30:01 -0800 (PST)
From:      Craig Carey <research@ijs.co.nz>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: misc/33567: RELENG_4 won't makeworld; bsd.dep.mk, Makefile.inc1 bugs; "Linux ELF" need of kernel
Message-ID:  <200202051930.g15JU1p77719@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/33567; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Carey <research@ijs.co.nz>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: misc/33567: RELENG_4 won't makeworld; bsd.dep.mk,
  Makefile.inc1 bugs; "Linux ELF" need of kernel
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 08:21:23 +1300

 At 02.01.29 04:45 -0800 Tuesday, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org wrote:
 
 ------------------
 ...
 Received: (from sheldonh@localhost)
 	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0TCjrt98270;
 	Tue, 29 Jan 2002 04:45:53 -0800 (PST)
 	(envelope-from sheldonh)
 *Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 04:45:53 -0800 (PST)
 *From: <sheldonh@FreeBSD.org>
 Message-Id: <200201291245.g0TCjrt98270@freefall.freebsd.org>
 *To: research@ijs.co.nz, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org,
 *	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
 *Subject: Re: misc/33567: RELENG_4 won't makeworld; bsd.dep.mk, Makefile.inc1
 *           bugs; "Linux ELF" need of kernel
 ------------------
 
  >Synopsis: RELENG_4 won't makeworld; bsd.dep.mk, Makefile.inc1 bugs; "Linux ELF" need of kernel
  >
  >State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
  >State-Changed-By: sheldonh
  >State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 29 04:45:39 PST 2002
  >State-Changed-Why:
  >It's hard to find outstanding issues in the audit trail of this PR.
  >That's part of the problem associated with reporting more than one
  >problem in a single PR.
  >
  >Given that the recommended procedure for downgrading from CURRENT to
  >STABLE is a binary install / upgrade, could you itemize the outstanding
  >problems that need attention?
 
 FreeBSD experts download hundreds of MB of files instead of editing up
 buildworld scripts to get them past a string of crashes?. I would
 recommend that advise on recommended downgrade methods be worded so that
 it does not apply to FreeBSD experts that know about how to edit the
 *.mk files (something that I thought needed for the v5->v4 downgrade).
 
 Perhaps that sentence starting with "Given that ..." is actually saying
 that most parts of my bug report are already disregarded. It is not that
 clear. It would unreasonable to be frank, to suppose that FreeBSD experts
 should themselves follow the 'alleged to exist' recommendation that
 apparently would apply against the masses that would fail in their
 attempt to go from v4 to v5.
 
 Such a closing would misses the aspect that a mere few added lines could
 be all that it takes to have less person hours being wasted. They may
 be a failure in the bug handling decision there. But I previously saw
 that Mr Clark was edging onto that. He and I were writing privately,
 including on bits around law. Messages never appeared at the report
 system.
 
 I find the sentence "Given that the .... attention", is very much too
 subtly worded, if indeed it is attempting to close most of the report.
 
 The dep.bsd.mk problems was about missing include file paths, and it
 was suggested that some recommendation says to get binary files which
 maybe makes no change to the include files. It is far from clear that
 following the recommendation does not lead to exactly the same problems.
 
 In any case, a quick closing on technical grounds can be unsound when
 the bugs are small and tiny in number and partly identified, and the
 inconvenience that not fixing them could cause is large. What happened
 to Mr Clark who was handling this. Since he and I did communicate over
 law in 'misc/33567' (and that has not made it into the bug system's
 archives) then there could have been a different outcome not that I
 can be sure if a "not recommended way was used" thing happened here.
 
 
  >
  >Please copy your feedback to <bug-followup@freebsd.org>, using the
  >subject line of this message.
  >
  >http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=33567
 
 
 I never found out why the report could not be reproduced. It is plain
 that many would not want to but there was a report that reproducing
 the problems of 33567 was attempted.
 
 I remind that I declared that these lines should be added to /usr/share/mk/bsd.dep.mk :
 
 
       CFLAGS+= -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/include \
                -I/usr/src/sys/i386/include -I/usr/src/sys/sys
 
 
 I added those lines and buildworld would proceed successfully except
 for resolvable problems with "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1". Thus even some
 testing of the described bug fixes was done.
 
 I will overlook the fact that a technical arguments was used.
 There are many ways to close this FreeBSD bug report.
 
 
 Craig Carey
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202051930.g15JU1p77719>