Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Sep 1997 06:14:30 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Cc:        peter@spinner.dialix.com.au (Peter Wemm), uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org (Frank Durda IV), phk@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, uhclem.ds3@nemesis.lonestar.org
Subject:   Re: bin/1037 
Message-ID:  <27081.874761270@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 20 Sep 1997 12:55:41 %2B0200." <19970920125541.KG31358@uriah.heep.sax.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Given the extent of Frank's negative experience with the non-changed
telnet and positive experiences with the changed one, I think it'd be
more than reasonable to add a flag which turns it *off* and uses the
settings he suggests as the default.  That way you still have your
escape hatch in case it causes dysfunction in some corner case yet all
those Windows puppies are happy in the OOB configuration.

Also, since nobody seems to care *too* much about this or we'd have
settled it in less than 2 years time, why not just let Frank commit it
and also take any of the potential heat if it doesn't work?  That'd
be the best "See, we *were* right about that default!" rebuttal of
them all. ;-)

					Jordan

> As Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> > > I don't see why you not just start your telnetd with `-l', instead of
> > > adding another hack to it.
> > 
> > No, this is different..  -l sets the "alwayslinemode".  The 'linemode' 
> > variable does something else.
> 
> Ok, explanation sold. :)  But then, my vote is still to make it another
> option (-L perhaps).
> 
> -- 
> cheers, J"org
> 
> joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
> Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27081.874761270>