Date: 14 Jan 1999 21:53:14 -0500 From: "Robert V. Baron" <rvb@cs.cmu.edu> To: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> Cc: zhihuizhang <bf20761@binghamton.edu>, hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: TSS and context switch Message-ID: <yzsd84hw8kl.fsf@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: "Ron G. Minnich"'s message of Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:25:16 -0500 (EST) References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990114162502.8149A-100000@terra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> writes: > I'm assuming you measured all this and determined that TSS was faster? > > Ron Let's make it simpler for him. Why don't you just let him look in the architecture manual for the 386/486/586 and PII and see how many cycles the load and save takes compared to what is done in practice. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yzsd84hw8kl.fsf>