From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 26 12:53:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0515437B406 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:53:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7QJwLr02345; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:58:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200108261958.f7QJwLr02345@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Kaila Cc: Kris Kennaway , Jim Bryant , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:42:45 CDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:58:21 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The motto used to be "do it right", not "do it the way WE want it on OUR > machines, and screw the people who don't make the decisions or cause to much > trouble to ignore." It still is. And recognising that csh has evolved over the last decade is part of "doing it right". What you're really saying is "you didn't do what *I* think is right, and I'm packing up my toys and going home". That's your perogative, but it's hardly the mature stance to be taking. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message