From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Apr 14 19:06:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA04519
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca9-12.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.76])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA04506
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id TAA02102; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704150205.TAA02102@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jseger@scds.ziplink.net
CC: jseger@scds.ziplink.net, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199704142103.VAA00336@scds.ziplink.net> (jseger@scds.ziplink.net)
Subject: Re: ports/3273: ports/mail/imap_uw won't compile
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Ah, gotcha.  What's the preferred format, context or unified?

I prefer unified diff (although I know that at least DavidG and rms
prefer context diffs :).

But if you are changing an existent patch, please follow the original
format.

Satoshi