From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 2 22:25:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA22413 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:25:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (mail.sni.de [192.109.2.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA22348 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:25:36 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nerv@localhost) by nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id HAA12749 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 07:06:31 +0200 Message-Id: <199604030506.HAA12749@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> Subject: Re: Laser Printers To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 96 8:22:03 MET DST From: Greg Lehey Cc: lehey.pad@sni.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9604021602.AA04623@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>; from "Garrett Wollman" at Apr 2, 96 11:02 am X-Mailer: xmail 2.4 (based on ELM 2.2 PL16) Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > < said: > >> To be fair to HP, this applies to all printers I know. The original >> definitions of CR and LF are: > >> Carriage return: return the carriage (print head) to the left margin. > >> Line feed: rotate the platen one line forward without moving the >> carriage. > >> UNIX abused LF to mean both functions, which saves space, but is still >> not correct. > > BZZZZT! Wrong, but thanks for playing. > > The alternative use of code 10 as NL (`newline') rather than LF > (`linefeed') was in ANSI X3.64-1968, and is still there today. I stand (partially) corrected. It obviously wasn't UNIX. However, assigning two different meanings to the same character must have come as the the result of a de facto usage rather than a planned change to the function. Was it Multics, perhaps? Greg