From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 11:33:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFFA1065695 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4348FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA00656; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:33:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OtfNn-0004e8-Ko; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:33:35 +0300 Message-ID: <4C88C60E.4020309@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:33:34 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nickolasbug@gmail.com References: <201009011653.o81Grkm4056064@fire.js.berklix.net> <201009080842.28495.jhb@freebsd.org> <201009081021.48077.jhb@freebsd.org> <4c88993e.MgMUYIGSfJIxECy9%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4C88AA05.5050909@icyb.net.ua> <4C88AB99.9030709@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy for removing nonworking code X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:33:39 -0000 on 09/09/2010 14:19 nickolasbug@gmail.com said the following: > 2010/9/9 Andriy Gapon : >> on 09/09/2010 12:33 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>> People, who care, are expected to read current@ and stable@ even if they use >>> only releases and security branches. At the very least, to see what's cooking >>> up for them and what to expect. >> >> Not to mention isdn@ for this particular case. >> BTW, I changed the subject line, because the code in question became non-working >> when Giant support in network stack was dropped. > > Please, stop this useless thread You first. -- Andriy Gapon