Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:33:42 -0500
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [iwn] scan fixes!
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxgnYxdAh0eVeq3ULw0BBxUqGbSLFv3s%2B1Oip42Y4MmocSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonEKtYNVxUXgmHLmZ7yeUD0yjz1MTjv1JAPU_Wx36gpNw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAJ-VmokichutcLwakRwVQRzq=PeEUYCgbYqFP8Yr9KUydYK6eA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonEKtYNVxUXgmHLmZ7yeUD0yjz1MTjv1JAPU_Wx36gpNw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I've tested this now on the Intel 5100 and the Centrino-N 2200
> (specifically to keep eadler@ happy!)

:)

> It turns out that yes, the 2200 works fine, and it also exposes the
> firmware TLV "flags" field, which includes a bunch of things:

I've just updated and will try to use only iwn for now.  I will let
this list know if anything goes wrong (or if everything goes right).


-- 
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnYxdAh0eVeq3ULw0BBxUqGbSLFv3s%2B1Oip42Y4MmocSg>