From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 06:15:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12350106564A; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2B98FC16; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F56022C50D7; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:15:31 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:15:30 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Ted Faber Message-ID: <20100414091530.547b28ec@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100413230322.GD84382@zod.isi.edu> References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100413230322.GD84382@zod.isi.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/qJah=bG_U7XKX3obGagj72_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:15:33 -0000 --Sig_/qJah=bG_U7XKX3obGagj72_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:03:22 -0700 Ted Faber wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > >=20 > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > > ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA > > is 6-7 April.=20 >=20 > I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still > unstable? ATM no, as it's apparent from the message bellow. Update to that message: - Gnome and KDE are ready - Xorg is believed to be ready, an -exp run on pointy is beginning today. On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 Charlie Kester wrote: > On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: =20 > >Hi, > > > > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > >ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is > >6-7 April. > > > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared > >lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / > >fixing. > > > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=3Dfailed_buildports&sort=3Dlast= _built > >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even > >fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the > >problems. > > > > > >Thank you, > > > >With hat: portmgr@ =20 >=20 >=20 > Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the > original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? =20 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300 Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. >>>> still work to do =20 I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. >>> Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware >>> of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed. =20 >>>> KDE in progress. =20 Packages status: - i386:=20 - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished >>>>finished =20 - 9 pacakges are from middle March >>> from 9 Apr. =20 - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). >>> in progress, with ports from yesterday =20 - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). >>>> nope, still old packages. =20 In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. >>> So no clear ETA yet, a few days more. =20 --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/qJah=bG_U7XKX3obGagj72_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvFXYIACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeX0mQCgrA+vJtvqM340/gUKY18BSVC3 n+QAn23kkgp5CiCOH6hgKsL0r6JV0WQG =qCX5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qJah=bG_U7XKX3obGagj72_--