Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 23:49:50 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Allen Campbell <allenc@verinet.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Naw, Netscape doesn't have a memory problem! Message-ID: <20000503234949.C727@physics.iisc.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000503120120.0410c100@localhost>; from brett@lariat.org on Wed, May 03, 2000 at 12:04:11PM -0600 References: <4.3.1.2.20000502210629.04400e80@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10005010030340.67368-100000@barricuda.bsd.nws.net> <200005022127.OAA00936@usr02.primenet.com> <4.3.1.2.20000502210629.04400e80@localhost> <20000502231735.A80066@const.> <4.3.1.2.20000503120120.0410c100@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I keep hearing this predictable blather > >about Netscape 6 and wondering just how cruel I have to be to a > >system to reproduce these `crashes', but I have yet to experience > >it. It's certainly not perfect but it rivals 4.x for stability. > > Not in my experience. Netscape's best developers are gone, and AOL > cares little about it since it's not a money maker. Frankly, I'm > surprised that they haven't just killed it off as a sacrifice to > the Great God Microsoft. Or maybe that's what they're doing -- > in an unusually slow and painful manner. I don't know about the windows version; it seems to have got some very good press reviews. The linux version certainly works pretty well, even on a freebsd box. R. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000503234949.C727>