From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 30 14:02:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 28C6516A40F; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:02:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE35216A504; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flag@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BA443E3A; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:01:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flag@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from newluxor.wired.org (ip-64-88.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.64.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB4311AE43; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:01:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (from flag@localhost) by newluxor.wired.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k9UE0vFq001763; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:00:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from flag) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:00:54 +0100 From: Paolo Pisati To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20061030140054.GA1750@tin.it> References: <200610300915.k9U9Fpp4079193@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061030140301.q7ko5hlezo0wk04s@webmail.leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061030140301.q7ko5hlezo0wk04s@webmail.leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: Perforce Change Reviews , Paolo Pisati Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 108717 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:02:52 -0000 On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > If nobody links with them directly (for example if those are plugins > which are loaded at runtime only when they are needed), you can use > OLD_FILES for them instead of OLD_LIBS. > > The goal of OLD_LIBS is to not remove libs which may break > applications when they are not available. For this reason symlinks to > libs and static libs (libXXX.a) are removed with OLD_FILES, it doesn't > hurt at program startup time if those are not available. ok, i'll use OLD_FILES then. bye -- Paolo Piso's first law: nothing works as expected!