From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 01:22:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1130216A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary@pattersonsoftware.com) Received: from mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BAB43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@pattersonsoftware.com) Received: from 203-206-97-36.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO sonic.pattersonsoftware.com) ([203.206.97.36]) by mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony1.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 09:21:59 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,208,1157299200"; d="scan'208"; a="658526525:sNHT18682594" Received: by sonic.pattersonsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7508A33C28; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:21:58 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:21:58 +1000 From: Gary Newcombe To: phatfish@gmail.com Message-ID: <20060924012158.GA44535@sonic.pattersonsoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing to a custom location with buildworld/DESTDIR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:22:02 -0000 On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:08:42 +0100 "Chris" wrote: > I have an encrypted disk setup where i want to install a fresh system using > buildworld/buildkernel on my current install. I looked around and it seems > that the bellow commands should do what i want. But I'm not sure if it is > the best way to do it, or if the procedure is out of date (I'm running 6.1). > cd /usr/src > setenv DESTDIR /mnt/root > make buildworld && make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > cd /usr/src/etc; make distribution Hi Chris, That's all I do, but you'll need to install world and kernel too. Cheers Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 02:53:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A032E16A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3590143D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-66-142-190-185.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [66.142.190.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19658114314 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:54:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:53:18 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <188DD322AA361E26DFC311B9@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========5DC5F6C85DA5260C78C4==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Device polling - worthwhile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:53:21 -0000 --==========5DC5F6C85DA5260C78C4========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I've been reading about device polling. I'm wondering if it's worth doing = on a busy website (4,000,000+ hits/month, 45GB+ bandwidth use). I=20 understand what polling is and how it queues traffic as opposed to the=20 "old-fashioned" interrupt method, but do you really gain performance-wise? = Are there any pitfalls to enabling it in the kernel? (I understand you=20 can enable/disable it using ifconfig.) Any gotchas regarding tuning?=20 (This is a production website. I don't want to cause problems that are=20 hard to figure out.) If it matters, I'm running 6.1 RELEASE, GENERIC kernel, Broadcomm GIG=20 NICs, 3.2GHz processor, 2GB of memory, apache 1.3.* Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========5DC5F6C85DA5260C78C4==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 04:33:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDB616A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FAB43D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6B5F71; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iTRpfHRA9bUj; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-96-195.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.96.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4645C6E; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <45160A98.9010500@mac.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:33:28 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <188DD322AA361E26DFC311B9@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> In-Reply-To: <188DD322AA361E26DFC311B9@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Device polling - worthwhile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:29 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I've been reading about device polling. I'm wondering if it's worth > doing on a busy website (4,000,000+ hits/month, 45GB+ bandwidth use). I > understand what polling is and how it queues traffic as opposed to the > "old-fashioned" interrupt method, but do you really gain > performance-wise? Are there any pitfalls to enabling it in the kernel? > (I understand you can enable/disable it using ifconfig.) Any gotchas > regarding tuning? (This is a production website. I don't want to cause > problems that are hard to figure out.) > > If it matters, I'm running 6.1 RELEASE, GENERIC kernel, Broadcomm GIG > NICs, 3.2GHz processor, 2GB of memory, apache 1.3.* If your NIC can do interrupt moderation, and most GB NICs will, that already provides most of the advantages of device polling without as much CPU overhead. Polling is best suited for routers and firewalls and very simple services like NTP. If this is a production website, you clearly should experiment with polling on another system until you are satisfied that you can make it work OK for your needs, right...? -- -Chuck PS: 4 million hits/month is about 1-2 hits per second, and about 2 KB/sec of bandwidth on average. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 05:49:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EB516A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3D943D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78B6B9CE; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NJrEa-orVdwY; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C4CB984; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45161C70.4070106@aeternal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:49:36 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schulz References: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com> In-Reply-To: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions Subject: Re: Zabbix Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:49:40 -0000 Hello David, David Schulz wrote: > The /usr/ports/net-mgmt/zabbix Port consists out of two components, > Server and Agent. I would like to install the Agent only, so it shouldnt > need all these large dependencies such as mysql etc, but i cant figure > out how to do that. I skimmed trough the Makefile, and it mentions > things about ZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY , but i can figure out how to turn that > knob. Can anyone tell me please? usually reading Makefile in the port directory can reveal the knob. In this case just use: make ZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY=yes install or, as has been proposed by Norberto Meijome, -DZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY. Also, if you use portupgrade, please add following to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf MAKE_ARGS section: 'net/mgmt/zabbix' => 'ZABBIX_AGENT_ONLY=yes', as portupgrade will need to know that you've used this knob in first install, so it would not install whole zabbix on the upgrade run. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 05:52:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768CB16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009DC43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19289B9CE; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuQju2-B1yfd; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26254B984; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45161D12.2070900@aeternal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:18 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Trevor References: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com> <20060922155323.710aeb62@localhost> <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Zabbix Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:22 -0000 Hello Charles, Charles Trevor wrote: > If done this way portupgrade et al shouldnt revert to building the > full package, which they seem to if you use a make flag to build the > client portion only. As to avoid this issue of portupgrade not knowing the make flags used during first install, there is /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file with its MAKE_ARGS section, where you can define this and portupgrade will know the make flags to be used during upgrade process. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 07:10:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA73316A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:10:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAEF43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:10:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480BA564BF for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaTmfTT9m6xA for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D8F4564B8; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060924071004.5D8F4564B8@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-09-03 - 2006-09-23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:10:49 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 4-Sep : Monitor your 3Ware battery backup unit (BBU) Why not monitor your battery? http://freebsddiary.org/3ware-netsaint-plugin-addenda.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 07:21:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9313216A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from mail.duras.ro (mail.duras.ro [86.105.56.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D1043D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:21:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id B061818741E for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:21:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.duras.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18278-03 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:21:14 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [86.105.56.194] (ma.plimb.cu.barca.prin.padure.ro [86.105.56.194]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EE1187285 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:21:14 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <451631C4.6040200@duras.ro> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:20:36 +0300 From: Mihai Tanasescu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (RedHat) at duras.ro Subject: Openbgpd TCP-MD5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:21:18 -0000 Hello, Does anyone know if TCP-MD5 is working with OpenBGP on Freebsd ? I've got a Freebsd 6.1 system (6.1-RELEASE-p5) on which I've tried both openbgpd and openbgpd-devel. The system has a test session now with a Cisco 3750 equipment. On the OpenBGPD machine I have setup the Cisco neighbor with the tcp md5sig password option. On the Cisco machine I have setup the OpenBGPD neighbor with the password option. Upon starting the session the OpenBGPD machine reported pfkey setup failed. I used setkey to add the following (after adding FAST_IPSEC and TCP-MD5 in the kernel): add ip-openbgpd ip-cisco-bgp tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "password I used"; On the Cisco device if I issue a show logg I can see: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from ip-openbgpd(179) to ip-cisco(15581) (RST) Also the OpenBGPD FreeBSD system displays: kernel: tcp_signature_compute: SADB lookup failed for ip-cisco Help wanted:) if possible Thanks, Mihai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 09:13:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F4D16A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F062643D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:13:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8O9Co6d060743; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:12:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8O9Co6d060743 Message-ID: <45164C0C.5010406@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:12:44 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Schuller References: <200609240036.12322.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> In-Reply-To: <200609240036.12322.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:13:11 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1931/Sun Sep 24 08:51:08 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf + ipv6 + keep state - any known issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:13:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter Schuller wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am using pf on a 6.1 machine. I have a tunneling interface (gif0) for= my=20 > IPv6 feed. The problem I am having is connecting to myself in spite of = > firewalling. >=20 > I am allowing traffic on port 22 to my public ipv6 address. I am also a= llowing=20 > all outgoing traffic on the tunneling interface, with 'keep state'. >=20 > ping6:ing myself works, but connecting to port 22 does not. The intial = SYN=20 > gets through and is responded to by an ACK, but that ACK is seemingly=20 > dropped. This inspite of the fact that 'pfctl -s state' shows a tracked= =20 > connection for the relevant port pair. >=20 > I can work around it by allowing all packets from my own IP on the tunn= eling=20 > interface, but as far as I know this should not be required. That is,=20 > connection tracking should be working even for local connections on a=20 > particular interface - correct? >=20 > Note that connecting to port 22 works perfectly from outside IP:s (I ha= d=20 > someone external verify this) without any special casing of the rules. = That=20 > is, I only have the usual rules for allowing the incoming packets to po= rt 22,=20 > and the rule allowing outgoing packets with 'keep state'. The fact that= this=20 > allows successful establishment to port 22 by an external party suggest= s to=20 > me that I have not made some trivial misstake in the rule - yet connect= ions=20 > to myself do not work. >=20 > My question is whether there are any known issues that this sounds like= - or=20 > of course if there is some reason why this is not supposed to work by d= esign. Are you using antispoofing rules on your external interface? If you've g= ot something like this in your ruleset: antispoof log quick for $ext_if Then it will expand into a series of rules containing the following when = you load them: block drop in log quick on ! em0 inet from 12.34.56.72/29 to any Where 12.34.56.72/29 is the address of the network your external interfac= e (em0) is attached to. (Although the example I show is for IPv4, exactly = the same applies for IPv6) End result is that you cannot connect to a service= listening on your external IP from the box itself, because that does not result in inbound packets traversing the em0 interface. And it's a 'quic= k' rule, so you can't override it by adding a more specific rule later in th= e ruleset. In general, use antispoof for the loopback as a standard part of any rule= set you write. Antispoof on other interfaces should be considered carefully = and only applied where necessary. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFFkwS8Mjk52CukIwRCFHSAJ9Rcl+cwoYgvWrr/uE9gUajpeulnQCfdt4l n8lwxDyMuUdHSrXRqD/DN3U= =NhqM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig77B6164B8715D84D4EC26350-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 09:23:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26F616A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hawkeye@netvision.net.il) Received: from mxout1.netvision.net.il (mxout1.netvision.net.il [194.90.9.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4616243D6A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:23:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hawkeye@netvision.net.il) Received: from MARTY ([217.132.103.200]) by mxout1.netvision.net.il (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with SMTP id <0J6300LHSBFCCI70@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for questions@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:37 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:26:46 +0200 From: "m.shenven" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1255 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: question: How to use SERIAL PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:23:40 -0000 uhclem@FreeBSD.org> < serial and UART Tutorial, by Frank Durda > Sirs, Where on the Internet can I details of: How to program a WINDOWS XP computer so that in will input/output to an external device through its SERIAL PORT? ANY information you can supply, would bew greatly appreciated ! m.shenven hawkeye@netvision.net.il From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 10:16:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEB616A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bloodyveins@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DCF43D53 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:16:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bloodyveins@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so355320uge for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:16:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NE4nYg5atfWnnIGDEAG5OXDEIni6PMZKtEPhVIth/95zBITr9oDcXOnKIkRf0kmAjKPsR0IjxuCR3Jta5KDQXiECVKqPs9XxttASG5QsTXBJADbKwKy3rDa2fUDF918AzEZRAIwRS2EiKLzHlKoWXrfmys+I2i6ZswISHjk7348= Received: by 10.66.220.17 with SMTP id s17mr2370019ugg; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.89.13 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58ebaa710609240316q7b63c7e7w76618655f1e9ac85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:16:42 +0700 From: "Mike Fern" To: m.shenven In-Reply-To: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question: How to use SERIAL PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:16:44 -0000 >On 9/24/06, m.shenven wrote: > uhclem@FreeBSD.org> > < serial and UART Tutorial, by Frank Durda > > Sirs, > Where on the Internet can I details of: How to program a > WINDOWS XP computer so that in will input/output to an external device through its SERIAL PORT? > > ANY information you can supply, would bew greatly appreciated ! > m.shenven > hawkeye@netvision.net.il afaik, there should be plenty of. in visual basic you can use mscomm object to utilize the serial port. in general, you can query "how to communicate with windows COM port". by the way, i think this is a freebsd list, not window$ :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 12:52:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4C16A51C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F311D43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:52:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ansarm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2053132pye for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=ll5q7sGabc50n/U4yZ+Q/+pNHeXpIJdb+T/A5SXbyJeLRbKvOD3z4o5N43f7J2BvsH14sVk7oanaMSGN6gaq5QLcvxjtRNaRRYCpmz9dtUOGn//gAyy/VzbJkUWlnP0KbEzVGan20ZWJZLp/1EHDvvcY8eT/jvsJj6YKTRjvwK4= Received: by 10.35.123.10 with SMTP id a10mr5441323pyn; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ansarmm2 ( [70.49.102.200]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm1325499nzo.2006.09.24.05.52.26; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: "'Ansar Mohammed'" , "'Robert Davison'" , Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:52:35 -0400 Message-ID: <001c01c6dfd8$4f64e4a0$0405a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: Acbe9hREUpR2lkrpEduySwAUUSJIlgAS1GBQAAZ/HvQAHyw0sA== Cc: Subject: RE: Thin Terminals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:52:29 -0000 > Does it dance the Sun Ray dance, or are we back to rolling our own? > > Ceri Huh? Clearly, its not as attractive as a Sun Ray. But I dunno about dancing and rolling.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 13:39:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9E616A522 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD443D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id a10so230298qbd for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=PidxFkxZVjXQB7UsG9acfuGezxnI35xOZGz3F8C5ydTxrcDNEqABgmTFKgYBY6ovbWG2UhRbz4bs/4Q9Ug8XOYJ8xvbZZvxcBpWpV/oFZfPN06pFpygv3I0Dcwb7L//qhoXMrrE2QQgZCK2dOggEQCMP/iByEBMDxgH4XEnHXi4= Received: by 10.35.72.1 with SMTP id z1mr6065490pyk; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.12 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 06:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:39:21 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Steve Roome" In-Reply-To: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 74dde3fbea22beeb Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon >R300 3d support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:39:23 -0000 On 9/23/06, Steve Roome wrote: > Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and > newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's > been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. > > So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org > port, or when that will be updated. xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:11:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A86B16A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6236543D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:11:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GRUhc-0001o9-0r for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:28 +0200 Received: from c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.85.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:28 +0200 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:11:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Arnold Date: 24 Sep 2006 07:10:01 -0400 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <86irjd8qra.fsf@PCBSD.localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-85-158.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Sender: news Subject: Dual Monitor problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:11:38 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 6.1 (by way of PC-BSD 1.2) and I'm trying to get my ATI x850 card to work with dual monitors. I have the xorg.conf set up correctly (see my blog post on the long hard battle to get that beachhead secured here: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/archives/000744.html ) but now I've run into further resistance and I can't seem to work around it. Soon after I get running using the dual monitors, the whole machine just freezes. This always happens, and usually while KDE is putting up its tip dialog box. I've tried using a different window manager (like fluxbox) but that didn't seem to help. Soon after logging in, the whole machine freezes solid. Anything else I can try? What sorts of things can I tweak? I run just fine if I don't do that dual monitor thing. You can see more or less what my xorg.conf file looks like on my blog post. I don't see any errors anywhere, including Xorg.0.log or .xsession-errors, or anything else in /var/log. The whole machine just freezes up. -- Jonathan Arnold Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD blog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:12:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C416A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DBila@care.org.mz) Received: from gate.care.org.mz (cust251-2.netcabo.co.mz [196.46.2.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046DE43D5C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DBila@care.org.mz) Received: from gate.care.org.mz (localhost.care.org.mz [127.0.0.1]) by gate.care.org.mz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BED061C65 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:45:06 +0200 (CAT) Received: from care.org.mz (unknown [192.168.40.60]) by gate.care.org.mz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6B61C2C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:45:05 +0200 (CAT) Received: from WorldClient by care.org.mz (MDaemon.PRO.v8.0.3.R) with ESMTP id md50000268232.msg for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:32 +0200 Received: from [192.168.40.130] via WorldClient with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:28 +0200 From: "David Bila" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Mailer: WorldClient 8.0.3 X-Authenticated-Sender: DBila@care.org.mz X-Spam-Processed: mail.care.org.mz, Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:32 +0200 (not processed: spam filter disabled) X-MDRemoteIP: 127.0.0.1 X-Return-Path: DBila@care.org.mz X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail.care.org.mz, Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:12:33 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NFS configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:36 -0000 Dear All, Im triyng to get NFS installed in one of my FreeBSD server so I can share some folders on it and be able to save documents on the shared folders remotely. I did all the configuration both in the server and the client. When I try to mount the exported folders I get a message saying Permission Dined. I did check the export file under /etc, the client I was trying to mount from is listed. What I might be missing? Thank you in advance for your help. David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:13:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE1216A47C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D246943D7B for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 22644 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 14:13:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ag/j8HxgrKfg6a4O5rQ6QM/gi6VDZVohGT/9oZVHJ72uOB8W4VJKYovfq8Gj6epqjFSDXV4W8H05MjUmIHs1ZdgNgrFhCw0TEatlMNx/sMOls5TFNHvUeevyODA0ffQmPnqZXLMUplKG4GtgSaPKrWZpcNYzArpOZPMSdMhNZ9M= ; Message-ID: <20060924141308.22642.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [75.15.29.212] by web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:13:08 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:13:08 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: freebsd 6.1 floppy installation problem - boot loader finds only 16MB, but I have 256 MB - and it hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:13:26 -0000 --- Voštenák Vladimír wrote: > Hi > > I have an old HP NETSERVER PRO 2xpentium pro, 256 MB > ram, > and I tried to install the actual FREEBSD 6.1 there. > I made 3 > floppies: boot, kernel1 and kernel2. When it starts > booting from > the boot floppy, the loader show I only have 16 MB > of RAM > (instead 256MB I have there). Then it asks for > kernel1 and 2 > disk, and boot disk again. It gives me also the > entry FREEBSD > display with countdown - to choose boot type - > default, no > acpi, secure etc. I tried it all, but it alwaysl > hangs after about 5 > second after any choice. So I must just reboot. I > think it is just > because the lack of RAM, because, I think it > requirets at least 24 > MB of RAM. > I have found something about this on the web, that > it is > necessary options "MAXMEM=n" to use all the RAM, > because old > BIOSes shows just first 16 MB or so, but I am just > doing the > installation. So how can I modify the kernel on the > floppies to > use such option during the installation from > floppies? Or should I > install from other media???Please can you help me > with > this??????How can I make the installation boot > floppy see all the > RAM I have? > Thank you very much for your reply. > > Greetings > > Vladimír Voštenák > make sure you don't have OS/2 compatability mode in your BIOS turned on. That will limit a system to 16 megs of RAM. I haven't played with an HP Netserver but I have several Kayaks that run things fine with about the same aged bios. -brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 14:21:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3B116A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat13.inode.at [62.99.145.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F33943D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.139] (port=2676 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-11.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GRUrP-0006NH-GR; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4516946A.1000900@inode.at> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:30 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bila References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:21:38 -0000 David Bila wrote: > Dear All, > > Im triyng to get NFS installed in one of my FreeBSD server so I can share > some folders on it and be able to save documents on the shared folders > remotely. I did all the configuration both in the server and the client. > When I try to mount the exported folders I get a message saying Permission > Dined. I did check the export file under /etc, the client I was trying to > mount from is listed. What I might be missing? Have you restarted mountd and nfsd after you added the hosts and mount points? (are you aware that you can only share whole mountpoints?) When you type mount, does it say "NFS exported" for the partitions you've made available? -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:08:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFA816A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6289E43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GRVaf-000Ejn-Sn; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:41 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:24 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Ansar Mohammed , 'Robert Davison' , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Thin Terminals Thread-Index: Acbe9hREUpR2lkrpEduySwAUUSJIlgAS1GBQAAZ/HvQAHyw0sAAEzSoH In-Reply-To: <001c01c6dfd8$4f64e4a0$0405a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Thin Terminals X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:45 -0000 On 24/9/06 13:52, "Ansar Mohammed" wrote: >> Does it dance the Sun Ray dance, or are we back to rolling our own? >> >> Ceri > > > Huh? > Clearly, its not as attractive as a Sun Ray. But I dunno about dancing and > rolling.. Does it work with Sun Ray server? Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:28:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EEE16A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FE743D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: (qmail 14126 invoked by uid 0); 24 Sep 2006 15:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.6?) (216.186.148.249) by smtp3.knology.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2006 15:28:14 -0000 In-Reply-To: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> References: <007401c6dfc3$efe42180$14fea8c0@MARTY> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5CD221BD-242E-4155-BC87-5ECFB7F5FD64@HiWAAY.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:28:11 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: question: How to use SERIAL PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:16 -0000 On Sep 24, 2006, at 5:26 AM, m.shenven wrote: > uhclem@FreeBSD.org> > < serial and UART Tutorial, by Frank Durda > > Sirs, > Where on the Internet can I details of: How to program a > WINDOWS XP computer so that in will input/output to an external > device through its SERIAL PORT? > > ANY information you can supply, would bew greatly appreciated ! > m.shenven > hawkeye@netvision.net.il First download and install the serial port driver CDs found here: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.1/ The above driver is much simpler to use than the serial port routines that come in Windows. Additional benefit is that code written to the FreeBSD driver works almost unchanged in MacOS X. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:29:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BC316A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFE443D5D for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:28:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atom.powers@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so1573804nfc for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p8BMZpXsG5H+oxzYcjMO4KMjrcJ2JoDyYRHFgWz2biqqP7S6JlyupSY+lbLA9EBgTUpN1YAACDWezXKAGhyx5JxQgiLOIbtIhsAjzsK0E2JZCMhWOnHR6/yKwGohqDr0zlN0fDXkZI6hqGQ+9R9whUeYqpdJ+nnJ6RF/tUP6RPI= Received: by 10.49.29.3 with SMTP id g3mr387280nfj; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.63.18 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:28:56 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" To: RJ45 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD locale and sympa X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:29:08 -0000 On 9/22/06, RJ45 wrote: > > Hello, > I installed sympa5 from the FreeBSD ports collection. > I am running FreeSBD 6.1 > > The problem is that the main sympa web interface does not show me the > language options, so I cannot choose a language, and also the language > menu is filled of spaces, empty spaces. > Also I can't even set a default language, only en_US works. > IS there any problem related to FreeBSD gettext ? > > anyone had this problem using sympa 5.2.1 on FreeBSD ? > I see the same behavior, but it's not a reqired feature for me so I haven't bothered trying to fix it. But IIR, there is an error in my sympa log that looks relevant; I don't remember the error but check your logs. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 15:54:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7C16A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CC643D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [10.35.4.65] (65.4-35-10-static.chueca.wifi [10.35.4.65]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67792E03D for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4516AA0B.5020209@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:53:47 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: USB based webcam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:54:57 -0000 Hi: I have a laptop with a built in webcam: ugen0: Vimicro Corp. USB2.0 Web Camera, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 Since this goes on the generic usb device, I guess there is no driver. Is this supported? Do I need to download a driver somewhere or will webcam software provide it? Secondly, what software is recommended to make this useful? Thansk, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 17:14:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095DE16A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6069543D5A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:14:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (waterbury-gen2cuda1-68-68-137-59.albyny.adelphia.net [68.68.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rawb.net) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8B3CF172E1 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Rob Gabaree Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:14:27 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: "kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604787 usec for pid 16 (yarrow)" messages.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:14:32 -0000 I see that in /var/log/messages I am getting messages like the following... Sep 24 13:08:36 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604849 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:36 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604842 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:38 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604787 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:38 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604787 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:40 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604719 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:40 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604719 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:42 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604665 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) Sep 24 13:08:42 tx kernel: calcru: negative runtime of -604665 usec for pid 16 (yarrow) It always happens to pid 16 (yarrow). I tried reinstalling the system as well and it still shows up. It doesn't always appear however; I just went two days without the message. I don't really know what is causing it? Anyone have any opinions? It is a SuperMicro PDSMi motherboard, Intel Pentium D 930 CPU. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 17:45:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A816A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890C843D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:45:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2134869pye for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pcy/cz042DC9GPiSP76fFA/sfddLdBoCTQ+QvrxylcWev3VWz84cBZTEZiaXpXMIG3NUKy8mRwd61gQ3TU+UPDhptyrK8dnv0MVdrNoc9xFzA9alnN2rv8PoPVU+orGbD6enTZ1S6CYzGuyNxrqlPnCjBchpegHyid/XaWjs7RM= Received: by 10.65.249.10 with SMTP id b10mr3137753qbs; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609241045l6a21b270s7a385599c190c86d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:45:42 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192" Subject: Problems with X mouse pointer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:45:44 -0000 ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, After an year of successful using of FreeBSD, a friend of mine asked me to install it on her laptop. The laptop is Pestigio Visconte 120 with Intel 855 chipset. I installed FreeBSD 6.1 and run X with only one problem. The mouse pointer in X is not a normal arrow, but a white big square. I can use the mouse - the pointer, although a square, responds to moves and clicks. I googled and I found some threads about "redglass" and "whiteglass" themes and I have them in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons. Could you please help me in adjusting the pointer in the X environment? I also enabled the mouse in the text terminals and it works fine - the pointer is an arrow. I am attaching /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /etc/rc.conf (with network information masked) for completeness and uname -a gives: FreeBSD ****.**** 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006 root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 Thank you very much for your help in advance. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=xorg.conf Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_eshq0cwg Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xorg.conf" U2VjdGlvbiAiU2VydmVyTGF5b3V0IgoJSWRlbnRpZmllciAgICAgIlgub3JnIENvbmZpZ3VyZWQi CglTY3JlZW4gICAgICAwICAiU2NyZWVuMCIgMCAwCglJbnB1dERldmljZSAgICAiTW91c2UwIiAi Q29yZVBvaW50ZXIiCglJbnB1dERldmljZSAgICAiS2V5Ym9hcmQwIiAiQ29yZUtleWJvYXJkIgpF bmRTZWN0aW9uCgpTZWN0aW9uICJGaWxlcyIKCVJnYlBhdGggICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIv WDExL3JnYiIKCU1vZHVsZVBhdGggICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvbW9kdWxlcyIKCUZvbnRQYXRo ICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2ZvbnRzL2N5cmlsbGljLyIKCUZvbnRQYXRoICAgICAi L3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2ZvbnRzL21pc2MvIgoJRm9udFBhdGggICAgICIvdXNyL1gxMVI2 L2xpYi9YMTEvZm9udHMvVFRGLyIKCUZvbnRQYXRoICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2Zv bnRzL1R5cGUxLyIKCUZvbnRQYXRoICAgICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL2ZvbnRzL0NJRC8i CglGb250UGF0aCAgICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy83NWRwaS8iCglGb250UGF0 aCAgICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy8xMDBkcGkvIgpFbmRTZWN0aW9uCgpTZWN0 aW9uICJNb2R1bGUiCglMb2FkICAiZGJlIgoJTG9hZCAgImRyaSIKCUxvYWQgICJleHRtb2QiCglM b2FkICAiZ2x4IgoJTG9hZCAgInJlY29yZCIKCUxvYWQgICJ4dHJhcCIKCUxvYWQgICJmcmVldHlw ZSIKCUxvYWQgICJ0eXBlMSIKRW5kU2VjdGlvbgoKU2VjdGlvbiAiSW5wdXREZXZpY2UiCglJZGVu dGlmaWVyICAiS2V5Ym9hcmQwIgoJRHJpdmVyICAgICAgImtiZCIKRW5kU2VjdGlvbgoKU2VjdGlv biAiSW5wdXREZXZpY2UiCglJZGVudGlmaWVyICAiTW91c2UwIgoJRHJpdmVyICAgICAgIm1vdXNl IgoJT3B0aW9uCSAgICAiUHJvdG9jb2wiICJTeXNNb3VzZSIKCU9wdGlvbgkgICAgIkRldmljZSIg Ii9kZXYvc3lzbW91c2UiCglPcHRpb24JICAgICJaQXhpc01hcHBpbmciICI0IDUgNiA3IgpFbmRT ZWN0aW9uCgpTZWN0aW9uICJNb25pdG9yIgoJSWRlbnRpZmllciAgICJNb25pdG9yMCIKCVZlbmRv ck5hbWUgICAiTW9uaXRvciBWZW5kb3IiCglNb2RlbE5hbWUgICAgIk1vbml0b3IgTW9kZWwiCkVu ZFNlY3Rpb24KClNlY3Rpb24gIkRldmljZSIKICAgICAgICAjIyMgQXZhaWxhYmxlIERyaXZlciBv cHRpb25zIGFyZTotCiAgICAgICAgIyMjIFZhbHVlczogPGk+OiBpbnRlZ2VyLCA8Zj46IGZsb2F0 LCA8Ym9vbD46ICJUcnVlIi8iRmFsc2UiLAogICAgICAgICMjIyA8c3RyaW5nPjogIlN0cmluZyIs IDxmcmVxPjogIjxmPiBIei9rSHovTUh6IgogICAgICAgICMjIyBbYXJnXTogYXJnIG9wdGlvbmFs CiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIk5vQWNjZWwiICAgICAgICAgICAgCSMgWzxib29sPl0KICAg ICAgICAjT3B0aW9uICAgICAiU1djdXJzb3IiICAgICAgICAgICAJIyBbPGJvb2w+XQogICAgICAg ICNPcHRpb24gICAgICJDb2xvcktleSIgICAgICAgICAgIAkjIDxpPgogICAgICAgICNPcHRpb24g ICAgICJDYWNoZUxpbmVzIiAgICAgICAgIAkjIDxpPgogICAgICAgICNPcHRpb24gICAgICJEYWM2 Qml0IiAgICAgICAgICAgIAkjIFs8Ym9vbD5dCiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIkRSSSIgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgCSMgWzxib29sPl0KICAgICAgICAjT3B0aW9uICAgICAiTm9EREMiICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAJIyBbPGJvb2w+XQogICAgICAgICNPcHRpb24gICAgICJTaG93Q2FjaGUiICAgICAg ICAgIAkjIFs8Ym9vbD5dCiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIlh2TUNTdXJmYWNlcyIgICAgICAg CSMgPGk+CiAgICAgICAgI09wdGlvbiAgICAgIlBhZ2VGbGlwIiAgICAgICAgICAgCSMgWzxib29s Pl0KCUlkZW50aWZpZXIgICJDYXJkMCIKCURyaXZlciAgICAgICJpODEwIgoJVmVuZG9yTmFtZSAg IkludGVsIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uIgoJQm9hcmROYW1lICAgIjgyODUyLzg1NUdNIEludGVncmF0ZWQg R3JhcGhpY3MgRGV2aWNlIgoJQnVzSUQgICAgICAgIlBDSTowOjI6MCIKRW5kU2VjdGlvbgoKU2Vj dGlvbiAiU2NyZWVuIgoJSWRlbnRpZmllciAiU2NyZWVuMCIKCURldmljZSAgICAgIkNhcmQwIgoJ TW9uaXRvciAgICAiTW9uaXRvcjAiCglTdWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAg MCAwCgkJRGVwdGggICAgIDEKCUVuZFN1YlNlY3Rpb24KCVN1YlNlY3Rpb24gIkRpc3BsYXkiCgkJ Vmlld3BvcnQgICAwIDAKCQlEZXB0aCAgICAgNAoJRW5kU3ViU2VjdGlvbgoJU3ViU2VjdGlvbiAi RGlzcGxheSIKCQlWaWV3cG9ydCAgIDAgMAoJCURlcHRoICAgICA4CglFbmRTdWJTZWN0aW9uCglT dWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAgMCAwCgkJRGVwdGggICAgIDE1CglFbmRT dWJTZWN0aW9uCglTdWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAgMCAwCgkJRGVwdGgg ICAgIDE2CglFbmRTdWJTZWN0aW9uCglTdWJTZWN0aW9uICJEaXNwbGF5IgoJCVZpZXdwb3J0ICAg MCAwCgkJRGVwdGggICAgIDI0CglFbmRTdWJTZWN0aW9uCkVuZFNlY3Rpb24KCg== ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=rc.conf Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_eshq3fqg Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rc.conf" CiMgLS0gc3lzaW5zdGFsbCBnZW5lcmF0ZWQgZGVsdGFzIC0tICMgRnJpIFNlcCAyMiAyMjo0OToz NSAyMDA2CiMgQ3JlYXRlZDogRnJpIFNlcCAyMiAyMjo0OTozNSAyMDA2CiMgRW5hYmxlIG5ldHdv cmsgZGFlbW9ucyBmb3IgdXNlciBjb252ZW5pZW5jZS4KIyBQbGVhc2UgbWFrZSBhbGwgY2hhbmdl cyB0byB0aGlzIGZpbGUsIG5vdCB0byAvZXRjL2RlZmF1bHRzL3JjLmNvbmYuCiMgVGhpcyBmaWxl IG5vdyBjb250YWlucyBqdXN0IHRoZSBvdmVycmlkZXMgZnJvbSAvZXRjL2RlZmF1bHRzL3JjLmNv bmYuCmJsYW5rdGltZT0iMzAwIgpmb250OHgxND0iY3AxMjUxLTh4MTQiCmZvbnQ4eDE2PSJjcDEy NTEtOHgxNiIKZm9udDh4OD0iY3AxMjUxLTh4OCIKa2V5bWFwPSJiZy5waG9uZXRpYy5jdHJsY2Fw cyIKbGludXhfZW5hYmxlPSJZRVMiCm1vdXNlY2hhcl9zdGFydD0iMyIKbW91c2VkX2VuYWJsZT0i WUVTIgpzYXZlcj0iZGFlbW9uIgpzc2hkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgp1c2JkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgoK bW91c2VkX2VuYWJsZT0iWUVTIgoKaWZjb25maWdfcmwwPSJESENQIgpob3N0bmFtZT0iKioqKi4q KioqIgo= ------=_Part_9370_26291294.1159119942192-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 18:42:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CCD16A47B for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenant@fastmail.fm) Received: from mail-relay-1.tiscali.it (mail-relay-1.tiscali.it [213.205.33.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E74C43D77 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greenant@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.8.3] (84.222.59.219) by mail-relay-1.tiscali.it (7.3.110.2) id 44EEFEAE001EBA60; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4516D1A0.5080201@fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:40 +0200 From: Alberto Rizzi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajm References: <20060916094959.GA16396@lakshmi.susmita.org> <20060916095735.GA43895@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060916143221.GA14164@powerfull.bsd> In-Reply-To: <20060916143221.GA14164@powerfull.bsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: girishvenkatachalam@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making simple colorful block diagrams for presentations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:42:49 -0000 ajm ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:57:35AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:20:00PM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I want a simple tool that can be used for preparing block diagrams and >>> arrows, that is all. I want to be able to use few colors, that is all. >>> >>> Please don't suggest openoffice or kde. I want something simple. >>> >> graphics/xfig might be worth looking at. >> >> >> -- >> >> Erik Trulsson >> ertr1013@student.uu.se > > > try also graphics/tgif > or graphics/dia -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:09:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4640316A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CA343D55 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:09:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 7C2A34AC8C; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B37C4AC48 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:09:24 -0000 Hi all, I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but restrict him to his home directory. I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to get it working. I have also read up on protftpd + ssl, and configuring it to lock users into their home directories. What would all of you recommend as a viable secure solution to this? Thanks! -Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:23:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A69B16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F56143D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rambiusparkisanius@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2158827pye for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TcmrIooAKp7Xa0KSleHQflsqlABk1kFSRHo5jiccprn9aW93F465irZto1nbYCDERqJ5oK5xwzXPF96kQmQEBdWr5+Vma29ySEDbFmy7uZCH5Re62f60DOv9F/w3h0ViMrBtvgLUbYx0Vm8MMcS7zTd0ttpFC0050u0FmWJD3So= Received: by 10.64.131.4 with SMTP id e4mr41854qbd; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.115.2 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ce7f740609241223n453147c7vaf550ca844dea99f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:23:08 +0300 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89ce7f740609241045l6a21b270s7a385599c190c86d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89ce7f740609241045l6a21b270s7a385599c190c86d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problems with X mouse pointer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:23:12 -0000 On 9/24/06, Ivan Rambius Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > After an year of successful using of FreeBSD, a friend of mine asked > me to install it on her laptop. The laptop is Pestigio Visconte 120 > with Intel 855 chipset. > > I installed FreeBSD 6.1 and run X with only one problem. The mouse > pointer in X is not a normal arrow, but a white big square. I can use > the mouse - the pointer, although a square, responds to moves and > clicks. I googled and I found some threads about "redglass" and > "whiteglass" themes and I have them in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/icons. Could > you please help me in adjusting the pointer in the X environment? > > I also enabled the mouse in the text terminals and it works fine - the > pointer is an arrow. > > I am attaching /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /etc/rc.conf (with network > information masked) for completeness and uname -a gives: > FreeBSD ****.**** 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 > 04:42:56 UTC 2006 > root@opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > > Thank you very much for your help in advance. > > Regards > Ivan > Hello, I found the solution by accident. I enabled the following option Option "SWcursor" "True" in Section "Device" in xorg.conf, then I restarted X and the mouse pointer was fine. Regards Ivan -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:25:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA3716A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F4C43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE36FB995; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4eYp4DmE2xe; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89ADB97B; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4516DBB6.3020701@aeternal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:25:42 +0200 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Juszczak References: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:25:47 -0000 Hello Matt, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but > restrict him to his home directory. > > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to > get it working. > > I have also read up on protftpd + ssl, and configuring it to lock users > into their home directories. > > What would all of you recommend as a viable secure solution to this? First of all, scp (scponly) is not a FTP service. Nevertheless both options are just fine. Proftpd is able to "jail" users inside their dirs. Settings required in proftpd.conf: DefaultRoot ~ [group] where ~ are their specified homedirs and group is optional (members of that group will be jailed to their homedirs, others will be able to browse everywhere, if group is not used, everybody using proftpd will be jailed). Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:26:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3557716A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8477A43D5E for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:22459 helo=http.aseed.net) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GRZcp-000NCE-Hu; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:51 +0000 Received: from amandla (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B5258297; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:27:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:26:50 +0200 From: albi To: Matt Juszczak Message-Id: <20060924212650.e5f20531.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> References: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:26:59 -0000 On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Matt Juszczak wrote: > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but > restrict him to his home directory. > > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to > get it working. and what do you mean "can't seem to get it working" ? with scponly you also have a chroot-option, if your user is the only scponly user, then the top-dir in the chroot-scponly setup could be his home-dir (disclaimer, i've successfully used scponly, but only read documentation about chroot-scponly, not used that yet) -- grtjs, albi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:29:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96A616A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523E743D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:29:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so376570uge for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QTGP3H2Y603uRg8xFwgQ9s8PjfGoCNgew3VlMlQdefjh+pZlkyX1pNPzaHVUdyXZpQ6APPzcOCT1IuVXhbJJJbvcbT4kLlZFfGFZ/2qDWqZa7JkrMsdZaSKFmeLWedgif0+wOFCyIej2VuH647uPUlpv4xPwmHS1bPjZbv/yOR8= Received: by 10.66.249.11 with SMTP id w11mr2714502ugh; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.224.6 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:29:42 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:29:56 -0000 Hi list, 512 MB of Ram, 1024 MB of swap, 6.1-STABLE After some time my system begins swapping, which is normal. The weird thing is that swapping goes on even after closing the memory consuming programs. here's the output of top(1): Mem: 103M Active, 37M Inact, 107M Wired, 6656K Cache, 60M Buf, 240M Free Swap: 1024M Total, 106M Used, 918M Free, 10% Inuse Why the swapped pages don't get recalled back to main mamory (which has sufficient free space for them), freeing the swap device and thus speeding the system up? Thanx for any explanation, Regards, -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:44:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8008516A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13F43D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8OJioPW063333; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:44:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:44:50 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20060924194450.GD73717@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:44:51 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 24), Pietro Cerutti said: > 512 MB of Ram, 1024 MB of swap, 6.1-STABLE > > After some time my system begins swapping, which is normal. > The weird thing is that swapping goes on even after closing the memory > consuming programs. > > here's the output of top(1): > > Mem: 103M Active, 37M Inact, 107M Wired, 6656K Cache, 60M Buf, 240M Free > Swap: 1024M Total, 106M Used, 918M Free, 10% Inuse I se no swapping here (that would show up as "###K In, ###K Out" on the swap line). You have swap space in use but not actively used. > Why the swapped pages don't get recalled back to main mamory (which > has sufficient free space for them), freeing the swap device and thus > speeding the system up? Once the kernel decides to swap a page, that area of swap is reserved until the process exits, even if the kernel pulls the data back from swap. That way if memory gets low again, the kernel knows it can quickly discard the in-RAM copy of the data (since there's already a copy in swap). Processes likely to have pages swapped out are getty&login proceses for unused ttys, lpd, sshd and other long-running daemons, etc. There's no reason to pull those pages back into RAM because you're more likely to need that RAM for something else. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 19:53:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACFD16A417 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E080443D62 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:53:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.56]) by mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 21:52:57 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:52:57 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.27.112] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:52:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:52:47 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 19:52:56.0988 (UTC) FILETIME=[08005DC0:01C6E013] Subject: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:53:05 -0000 Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not possible. The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, but receiving ... Any help appreciated, regards oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 20:02:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8800316A601 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat07.inode.at [62.99.145.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2539143D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.139] (port=3002 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-07.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GRaAw-0002B2-Rp; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:02:06 +0200 Message-ID: <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:02:05 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:02:08 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. > > I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is > working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not > possible. > > The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall > disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, > but receiving ... > > Any help appreciated, Are you connceted directly to the net or over a router / server with nat? If it's not directly you have to forward ports to the client pc for direct connections (like file sending) -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 20:28:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B9016A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FED343D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so379140uge for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lnSr5hXTNf3k8fCYmsnHY1hum0SrZjeu7c0JX+TC/DcvJEnQD4GAC/eZhjL4ToyFELDPNm5oSmI8u11V0knls6iYLm5scZ+9IbS2T73W3hIxMJY3MSVEz71ZPdQOvJGZmBJ3lPXfM4IFHjHTav0oo2BYref7ukhg556lcEpVvjw= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr2745574ugl; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.224.6 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:28:30 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: "Dan Nelson" In-Reply-To: <20060924194450.GD73717@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060924194450.GD73717@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:28:33 -0000 On 9/24/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > Once the kernel decides to swap a page, that area of swap is reserved > until the process exits, even if the kernel pulls the data back from > swap. That way if memory gets low again, the kernel knows it can > quickly discard the in-RAM copy of the data (since there's already a > copy in swap). Thanx for the insight... > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 20:42:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589D16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ajmm@portugalmail.pt) Received: from aragorn.portugalmail.pt (aragorn.portugalmail.pt [195.245.179.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9A243D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ajmm@portugalmail.pt) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aragorn.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id C496CCD5F; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:25 +0100 (WEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at portugalmail.pt Received: from aragorn.portugalmail.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aragorn.portugalmail.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFeh6YUf5Gso; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:25 +0100 (WEST) Received: from galadriel.portugalmail.pt (galadriel.portugalmail.pt [195.245.179.73]) by aragorn.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A83CD31; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:25 +0100 (WEST) Received: by galadriel.portugalmail.pt (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0B6E5DC250; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:31:29 +0100 (WEST) Received: from 85.138.132.105 ( [85.138.132.105]) as user ajmm@portugalmail.pt@imap.portugalmail.pt by webmail3.portugalmail.pt with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:31:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1159126289.4516dd118b4f6@webmail3.portugalmail.pt> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:31:29 +0100 From: ajmm@portugalmail.pt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 85.138.132.105 Cc: ohartman@uni-mainz.de Subject: Hitachi disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:42:28 -0000 Hi! I saw your posts with title "Performance issue amd64". I don't know if this could help, but I'm having the same problem with ICH5 SATA controller and the same Hitachi drives on linux. I cannot activate DMA, and bandwidth is lesser than 10MB/s. I could not solve the problem, until now. BTW, with "any" other drives, the problem does not exist. Antonio Marques __________________________________________________________ Continua a preferir gastar mais? Compare o preço da sua ligaçăo ŕ Internet http://acesso.portugalmail.pt/compare From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:05:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D033D16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC543D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: from sage.thought.org (kline@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k8OL501o034131 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:05:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@sage.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by sage.thought.org (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k8OL50Sv034130 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:05:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:05:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20060924210500.GA34045@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: some apps very slow under Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:05:02 -0000 Guys, This may/may not prove the superiority of BSD over the Linux kernel, dunno. Maybe you can help me figure out what I need to tune; or (*sob*) lighten my load on ethos. I've got three of the 4 default workspaces full of apps. Mostly xterms or "gnome-terminals". I have 1G RAM, a huge disk, a 2800 AMD chip, yet realplay is *very* slow to respond. It's time-counter changes only ever 8 seconds and when I cover part or all, it takes several seconds to fill back in. Is this a bug in xorg or in realplay or what? Last night I closed realplay and began having similar problems with one of the terminals. I have run CTWM for years so am used to a lightweight wm. I haven't checked to see if gnome/kde-LITE are available. That may be the problem. I am reluctant to post this to the ubuntuforums because I've already asked enough idiot questions ... (Sure, I do the same here, but I know you guys:-) I could close all my xterms and see, but it took hours to get things configured just the way I want! tia, you'n's, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:12:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5799E16A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasonartz@yahoo.com) Received: from web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE2A943D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jasonartz@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 98575 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 21:12:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JAZRqeroQ+LMh1S833ywQ8uDdxc+lrHaxN+yIgVSlRqSI+qkA8EpEy/GmAAZQYMhbxT9wDFmQVvybPG61PhlTicV0BgMK3PCoffaFYN2I69y0blgBd0mpUVT9mFVCbtlsTWCWbQqkSA3XvSfP86POJfUs/wxvwrZ+hqYwadVq5Q= ; Message-ID: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.67.98.178] by web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:24 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:12:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Artz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:25 -0000 --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but I > only > > have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to > get > > 6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under "Options, > Release > > name"), but I read that using an old sysinstall to > > install a new version is a bad idea. I cannot > figure > > out how to obtain a new sysinstall without making > boot > > floppies (I have no floppy drive nor a CDRW). Can > I > > install 5.3 and then somehow upgrade via FTP to > 6.1? > > Or download the new sysinstall to my 5.3 > installation, > > run it, and install 6.1 instead? What's the best > > method? > > Can you just download the 6.1 iso disks and make new > installer disks? > > Otherwise, you can install 5.3 and use cvsup to > upgrade to 6.1 > through a source upgrade. Just follow the > instructions carefully. Is there a way to do a binary install instead of downloading all the new sources and compiling them as an upgrade? I don't have a floppy or CDRW drive so I cannot burn new installer disks. I am stuck with 5.3 installer disks. It seems that there should be a way for me to do a fresh, binary install of 6.1 from 5.3. What if someone sent me a copy of 6.1s sysinstall and I ran it from the 5.3 environment? Would that allow me to do a proper, fresh 6.1 install via FTP? I have tried installing 6.1 with my sysinstall and it will not boot. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:18:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C47016A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBFA43D4C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (waterbury-gen2cuda1-68-68-137-59.albyny.adelphia.net [68.68.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rawb.net) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E56711749B for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:29 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Rob Gabaree Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:27 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:31 -0000 Hi, I have a remote server that I don't plan on using for email as I have another server to handle that. My question is.. is it a bad idea to _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? Right now /etc/ rc.conf has: sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" But I checked /var/log/maillog and saw about 5 archives of messages that looked like this: Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8I719YD078452: k8O71858063140: return to sender: Cannot send message for 5 days Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8O71858063140: to=postmaster, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=49386, relay= [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? Thanks for any help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:18:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5A416A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF243D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5951A3C1F; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 092AA51221; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:18:32 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jason Artz Message-ID: <20060924211832.GA48175@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:18:34 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Jason Artz wrote: > Is there a way to do a binary install instead of > downloading all the new sources and compiling them as > an upgrade? Sort of. You can do it by hand if you're careful (the install files -- base.aa, etc -- are just .tar.bz2 files cut up into chunks which you can recombine and extract with cat | tar), but you'll need to take care to avoid overwriting things like /etc that you may care about. Kris --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFFvYoWry0BWjoQKURAtpwAJ4jiT1Asg7mYEGYog1plthqK8eIEQCdHSbo mHtukwEGdLX3Pr6flwM52SI= =RQIo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:33:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE58916A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B87B43D53 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:33:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront01.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 23:33:41 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:33:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.27.112] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:33:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4516F999.2080309@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:33:13 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajmm@portugalmail.pt References: <1159126289.4516dd118b4f6@webmail3.portugalmail.pt> In-Reply-To: <1159126289.4516dd118b4f6@webmail3.portugalmail.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 21:33:18.0491 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D18CEB0:01C6E021] Cc: ohartman@uni-mainz.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hitachi disk performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:33:43 -0000 ajmm@portugalmail.pt wrote: > =20 > =20 > Hi! =20 > =20 > I saw your posts with title "Performance issue amd64". I don't know if = this =20 > could help, but I'm having the same problem with ICH5 SATA controller a= nd the =20 > same Hitachi drives on linux. I cannot activate DMA, and bandwidth is l= esser=20 > than 10MB/s. I could not solve the problem, until now. BTW, with "any" = other=20 > drives, the problem does not exist. =20 > =20 > Antonio Marques =20 > __________________________________________________________ > Continua a preferir gastar mais? > Compare o pre=E7o da sua liga=E7=E3o =E0 Internet > http://acesso.portugalmail.pt/compare > =20 I did not dig deeper into that problem - due to the lack of suitable=20 hardware. Bonnie shows about 55 MB/s sustained performance, sometimes=20 higher, burst reaches 117 MB/s. With the old disks, both values were=20 about 25 MB/s higher. I doubt this is only a partition layout related=20 issue. The average performance droped remarkable, especially while=20 compiling world. At the Hitachi website I did not find any hint about issues with several = controllers or especially with SATA PseudoRAID like nForce4 offers, hope = this can be fixed anyway and it's a simple firmware issue. Checking the disks via the Hitachi brewn drive fitness tool gives no=20 suspicious data, mode is SATA II/300, no accoustic or energy management=20 and so on ... I would appreciate any solvage, if you have one! Well, in your case, I would check whether your drive is in SATA 150 mode = (factory setting) or SATA 300, as I know the ICH5 is only SATA 150 and=20 drives with problems switching to SATA 150 while in SATA 300 could cause = problems. Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:38:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DB416A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8136C43D69 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront01.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.27.112] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:38:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4516FAB7.3050102@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:37:59 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Armin Pirkovitsch References: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> In-Reply-To: <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 21:38:04.0463 (UTC) FILETIME=[B78CABF0:01C6E021] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:09 -0000 Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. >> >> I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is >> working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not >> possible. >> >> The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall >> disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, >> but receiving ... >> >> Any help appreciated, >> > > Are you connceted directly to the net or over a router / server with nat? > If it's not directly you have to forward ports to the client pc for > direct connections (like file sending) > > My box at home is connected to the net via a DSL router. The box has a 192.168.xxx.xxx Ip, and therefore, I think you sketched the problem the right way. Is there a way to do this automatically via pf(1)? It would be weird to forward each connection, most of them DHCP obtained IPs, by hand. Sorry, I'm not very familiar with that stuff ... Regards, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:38:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F4116A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxsf31.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf31.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA1B43D6A for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxip36a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip36a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.251]) by mxsf31.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8OLcYL9024321 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:38:34 -0400 Received: from 71-92-102-230.dhcp.knwk.wa.charter.com (HELO yak.mseubanks.net) ([71.92.102.230]) by mxip36a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 17:38:33 -0400 From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:38:31 -0700 Message-Id: <1159133911.746.23.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mse_software@charter.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:38:37 -0000 On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: > Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or > would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I've found on the net. I searched the UPDATING on HEAD and for > anything that might be related but found nothing. Everything I could > google on the subject led me to sources that didn't appear to be > related to the project. I'm suspicious of using patches being > developed outside of the freebsd community yet I'd really hoped to > move to a completely jailed OS for our servers. Is it just too soon > to be looking for this capability in a production capacity? I suppose you could alias your primary network interface, then use a simple firewall with multiple divert sockets for address translation, thereby forwarding packets to a single jail IP (possible with multiple jail ports open). -Michael S. Eubanks mse_software@charter.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:39:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520DE16A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F350543D86 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 38513 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 21:39:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GsGsenb9PueJe5nwSOiSopqcP3mlrnXp0CAvsk1ymzD2loHVOKMcJbBCeGWno5SuI0Fhp632MUHBavo67fYIHuJS3TN9/dJ/ZJSqcBBrpeo/ZJdeX5ECccjPoVI/PnV7liZVpZjoXX0eyQ5+uknWfCLpfmtW5CTxh/WT17PwYg4= ; Message-ID: <20060924213926.38511.qmail@web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Received: from [74.107.110.13] by web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:39:26 EDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:39:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael S To: Rob Gabaree , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:39:38 -0000 I have the same four lines in rc.conf, but that is because I installed postfix. If you want to disable it completely, you'd use sendmail_enable="NONE", but you wouldn't be able receive messages sent by crontab, syslogd, etc. Michael --- Rob Gabaree wrote: > Hi, > > I have a remote server that I don't plan on using > for email as I have > another server to handle that. My question is.. is > it a bad idea to > _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? > Right now /etc/ > rc.conf has: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > > But I checked /var/log/maillog and saw about 5 > archives of messages > that looked like this: > > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8I719YD078452: > k8O71858063140: > return to sender: Cannot send message for 5 days > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8O71858063140: > to=postmaster, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=49386, relay= > [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > So what should I do? Should I just have > "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / > etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is > disabled? That way > messages could be sent without the above errors? Or > what? > > Thanks for any help. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:42:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FEE16A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwc@stilyagin.com) Received: from puffy.asicommunications.com (puffy.asicommunications.com [216.9.200.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D76743D58 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwc@stilyagin.com) Received: from zloy.stilyagin.com (71-35-25-152.phnx.qwest.net [71.35.25.152]) by puffy.asicommunications.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8OLgnAG005229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:42:50 -0700 (MST) Received: (from dwc@localhost) by zloy.stilyagin.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8OLgmbf007184; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:42:48 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:42:48 -0700 From: Darrin Chandler To: Rob Gabaree Message-ID: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:42:51 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:18:27PM -0400, Rob Gabaree wrote: > > So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / > etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way > messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? You should allow the system to send out it's mail. And it should go somewhere meaningful (i.e., to you). And you should read it. All my systems send me mail every day, and I scan through it to make sure everything is okay. That's what those messages are for. :) So, yes. You should disabled incoming, but allow submit, etc. You can also firewall off incoming instead or in addition. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:49:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642D16A40F for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from mx.inode.at (lb01nat02.inode.at [62.99.145.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B595F43D76 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:49:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a.pirko@inode.at) Received: from [85.124.24.139] (port=13760 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smartmx-02.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GRbqW-0007dJ-JM; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4516FD52.2040203@inode.at> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:49:06 +0200 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4516E20F.7050402@mail.uni-mainz.de> <4516E43D.8070506@inode.at> <4516FAB7.3050102@mail.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <4516FAB7.3050102@mail.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAIM not capable of sending files, but can receive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:49:10 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > Armin Pirkovitsch wrote: >> O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> Sorry, maybe a little bit off-topic here. >>> >>> I tried using GAIM as IM, but ran into trouble. Receiving documents is >>> working, but with or without any kind of firewall sending files is not >>> possible. >>> >>> The GAIM installation is as is taken from the ports collection, firewall >>> disabled ... Tried ICQ/MSN/Yahoo and IRC, always the same, no sending, >>> but receiving ... >>> >>> Any help appreciated, >>> >> >> Are you connceted directly to the net or over a router / server with nat? >> If it's not directly you have to forward ports to the client pc for >> direct connections (like file sending) >> >> > My box at home is connected to the net via a DSL router. The box has a > 192.168.xxx.xxx Ip, and therefore, I think you sketched the problem the > right way. Is there a way to do this automatically via pf(1)? It would > be weird to forward each connection, most of them DHCP obtained IPs, by > hand. Sorry, I'm not very familiar with that stuff ... Well the portforward has to be done on the router, and the clients need to know which ports they "own" on the inet ip. It's part of the file sending protocol (at least icq and irc work that way) So a portforward table which defines which ports are forwarded to which ip is imho the only option. -- Armin Pirkovitsch a.pirko@inode.at From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 21:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1026016A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706E843D53 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.175.26]) by bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:34 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:33 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.175.200 by by104fd.bay104.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.150.204.60] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20060924212650.e5f20531.albi@scii.nl> From: "Marwan Sultan" To: matt@atopia.net Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:32 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 21:59:33.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[B80F9030:01C6E024] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:59:35 -0000 Hi Matt! If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot and thats all!! if the file does not exist. then create it. add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any upper level of shell. have fun, Marwan Sultan System Administrator. >On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >Matt Juszczak wrote: > > > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but > > restrict him to his home directory. > > > > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to > > get it working. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57116A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F943D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.144]) by mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8OM5obW002989 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:05:51 -0400 Received: from 71-92-102-230.dhcp.knwk.wa.charter.com (HELO yak.mseubanks.net) ([71.92.102.230]) by mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 18:05:51 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,210,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="87794390:sNHT26092356" From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:05:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1159135548.746.34.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mse_software@charter.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 -0000 On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: > Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or > would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I've found on the net. I searched the UPDATING on HEAD and for > anything that might be related but found nothing. Everything I could > google on the subject led me to sources that didn't appear to be > related to the project. I'm suspicious of using patches being > developed outside of the freebsd community yet I'd really hoped to > move to a completely jailed OS for our servers. Is it just too soon > to be looking for this capability in a production capacity? > Just a quick addition. I don't think you'd even need multiple divert sockets unless you have multiple interfaces on the external and/or internal sides. Depends on what your setup looks like and what you're trying to accomplish. -Michael S. Eubanks mse_software@charter.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:16:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0F616A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from mx4.x15.net (mx4.x15.net [69.55.237.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ED143D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@voidcaptain.com) Received: from j1.x15.net [63.196.213.76] by mx4.x15.net with ESMTP id 608060222X1GRcH4000I8N76; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:34 +0000 Message-ID: <451703A3.6030000@voidcaptain.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:16:03 -0700 From: Pete Slagle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Gabaree References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:16:35 -0000 Rob Gabaree wrote: > I have a remote server that I don't plan on using for email as I have > another server to handle that. My question is.. is it a bad idea to > _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? Yes. You probably want to allow the server to send you administrative mail that it generates itself, but not let it receive any from outside. To do that: (1) Use the default settings for sendmail by not specifying any . Delete all lines containing "sendmail" from /etc/rc.conf. This will allow outgoing mail only. (2) Put a line in /etc/aliases that defines who receives root's e-mail for the server. Point it to your actual e-mail address. For example, root: my_addy@example.com (3) Reboot. That's it. Now the box can send you it's status information, but it won't listen for any incoming mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:24:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0814516A47C for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eagletree@hughes.net) Received: from n126.sc0.cp.net (smtpout1070.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB5743D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eagletree@hughes.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (67.47.213.85) by n126.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as eagletree@hughes.net) id 4516BEE50000AB01 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:18 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <1159133911.746.23.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> References: <1159133911.746.23.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <524D5EFE-0D42-49A1-9D94-FDED36827396@hughes.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:24:13 -0700 To: freeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:24:25 -0000 On Sep 24, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Michael Eubanks wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: >> Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or >> would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I suppose you could alias your primary network interface, then use a > simple firewall with multiple divert sockets for address translation, > thereby forwarding packets to a single jail IP (possible with multiple > jail ports open). > Thank you, that does sound like an interesting approach. The application is maintain the multiple IP Addresses for the sites though the sites actually share much code and data. I also attempted using multiple jails all pointing to the same file system but was naturally discouraged by the jail configuration to do so as this seems to violate the concept. Seems wasteful of memory too. I will try the divert method next using a single jail. Thank you again for the reply. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:33:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E1E16A416 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp154.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CB643D66 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:33:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@rawb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (waterbury-gen2cuda1-68-68-137-59.albyny.adelphia.net [68.68.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rawb.net) by relay5.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 21FB1174F4 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> References: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rob Gabaree Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:33:23 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:33:34 -0000 Thanks. What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable="NO"` and in / etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email address: root user@mydomain.com I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to my @mydomain.com email. Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? Thanks, rob On Sep 24, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:18:27PM -0400, Rob Gabaree wrote: >> >> So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / >> etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way >> messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? > > You should allow the system to send out it's mail. And it should go > somewhere meaningful (i.e., to you). And you should read it. > > All my systems send me mail every day, and I scan through it to make > sure everything is okay. That's what those messages are for. :) > > So, yes. You should disabled incoming, but allow submit, etc. You can > also firewall off incoming instead or in addition. > > -- > Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group > dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ > http://www.stilyagin.com/ | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:38:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9F516A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthieu.michaud@epita.info) Received: from marge.cload.net (marge.cload.net [88.191.31.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1643D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthieu.michaud@epita.info) Received: (qmail 87584 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2006 22:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO moe.cload.net) (192.168.2.16) by 0 with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 22:38:33 -0000 From: Matthieu Michaud To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: EPITA SRS 2007 - Adaptive Hacking Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:38:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1159137511.81627.5.camel@moe.cload.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: michael.cadilhac@gmail.com Subject: make behavior with obj directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:38:36 -0000 i was noticed this behavior using make on freebsd and netbsd : ohmer@moe$ cat Makefile all: pwd ohmer@moe$ make pwd /usr/home/ohmer ohmer@moe$ mkdir obj ohmer@moe$ make pwd /usr/home/ohmer/obj it seems a hard coded make behavior so it rather looks like a feature than a bug. why is that ? -- Matthieu Michaud EPITA SRS 2007 - Adaptive Hacking From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:56:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F9716A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from whatawonderfulworldweliveintoo@yahoo.com) Received: from web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E417743D49 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whatawonderfulworldweliveintoo@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27404 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Sep 2006 22:56:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6I0zaNq9UBiRW/FfEtHj0Y1B93W0CEEpUVCiNpFFvqeQyDPKIABuUOjftU872NeFooAeXSSFKx6tdVNXCFiAM9u894+hk2C4RVoGtQrcWT0r4rFNYCCvXQx9BzO3iQPvZBjLdrbtHtdrC6C1A8e4d/G66Kjc2CARmmge/rYp5KY= ; Message-ID: <20060924225654.27402.qmail@web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.19.14.15] by web58408.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:56:54 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:56:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Ted Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Problem w/ py-ldap Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:56:55 -0000 Hi; I've installed the py-ldap from the ports doing the "make install clean" dance. Everything seemed to proceed smoothly. However, when I fired up my python interpreter and entered "import ldap" it didn't recognize the module. So something went wrong and I don't know what :( I did get this from the installation. Is it a problem? ===> Registering installation for py24-ldap2-2.2.0 cyrus-sasl-2.1.22: "/usr/ports/1" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete openldap-sasl-client-2.3.27: "/usr/ports/1" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete py24-ldap2-2.2.0: "/usr/ports/1" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete If not, what is the problem? TIA, Ted2 --------------------------------- Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:59:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B889416A407 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016C543D67 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.161.40]) by bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:59:56 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:59:56 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com From: "Jack Stone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:59:54 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2006 22:59:56.0387 (UTC) FILETIME=[2748CB30:01C6E02D] Subject: Recompiling base sendmail with another DB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:59:59 -0000 I've wanted to test the use of some of snertsoft's milters, but they require a Berkley DB-4.1+ I believe instead of the 1.85 used by the base system's sendmail. Somewhere I read about recompiling sendmail, which then would allow me to comile with a different DB choice. The steps are below. Where would I add the option for a different DB...??? # cd /usr/src/lib/libsm # make obj && make depend && make # cd /usr/src/lib/libsmutil # make obj && make depend && make # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/ # make obj && make depend && make && make install # cd /etc/mail # make all install restart Thanks, Jack _________________________________________________________________ Share your special moments by uploading 500 photos per month to Windows Live Spaces http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.get.live.com/spaces/features From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 23:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E489A16A412 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2983E43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 69972 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2006 23:42:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1cwz3qOaOMb5ckowAbspk4Yqsd4DxCaoToP+jrnjCim1YCnMFaU9IHBITwzYXsVzJ0gJn0Llba5FyaJMPzQoh0U3j0N0qBQPnXycHVWt7T8JReDSrtkaDhZ/KY+BrM1ozvEVm6mErnRcKYTM3qpgojIj1tae9WRaNPr+BM9AU74= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (wittig.robert@sbcglobal.net@70.142.248.62 with plain) by smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2006 23:42:39 -0000 Message-ID: <45171839.9020804@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:43:53 -0500 From: Robert C Wittig User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Gabaree References: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:42:42 -0000 Rob Gabaree wrote: > Thanks. > > What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable="NO"` and in > /etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email address: > > root user@mydomain.com > > I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as > well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. > > It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to my > @mydomain.com email. > > Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? I run OpenBSD on my mailservers, but I expect that the sendmail works basically the same. In /etc/rc.conf or its FreeBSD equivalent, check the sendmail line to see if it references localhost.cf or sendmail.cf localhost.cf will permit internal mail on the machine, so that root can send messages to your everyday UID, etc., but will not permit mail to be sent to or received from, the Internet, or other machines in you LAN. sendmail.cf will permit full Internet email, but even this will not permit Internet email, unless your machine has a fully Qualified Domain Name, which is registered with your domain registrar, and has the Registrar's MX setting configured properly. -- -wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/ . http://robertwittig.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 23:47:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E0016A403 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (justnosweat.net [80.126.252.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B987343D45 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:47:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from justnosweat.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by justnosweat.net (8.13.6/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8P1pVWw043063 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:51:32 GMT (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Received: from localhost (justins@localhost) by justnosweat.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id k8P1pUoD043060 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:51:31 GMT (envelope-from justins@justnosweat.net) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:51:30 +0000 (UTC) From: justin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060925013537.I43034@justnosweat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on justnosweat.net Subject: lpd hewlett packard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:47:44 -0000 Hello, I`m trying to configure my hp deskjet 520 and i`m running into some trouble. The handbook says it all has to do with the interupt driven configuration, it does not work with some new hp printers. I have to switch to the polled mode. "If you want polled mode, remove in your /boot/device.hints file, the following line: hint.ppc.0.irq="N"". Then they say i have to rebuild my kernel. Now i ask myself what the /boot/device.hints file has to do with my kernel. What sort of file is /boot/device.hints and why do i have to rebuild my kernel. Thanks inadvance, Justin. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 00:50:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87116A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com [216.252.101.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C565243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:49:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 58282 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 00:49:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JGXcEavv2+Ns/tF/xTyCTRX7gffNMpkZYc5QrzRZ9G+C3gCSa3ThrQNiiRcRtFFHltjBXNnkA5k0gW4q2A8ic6YoE26QoxFWMEGSCOXd50gy1YCXXLB05IfEJHQnx6BqhXvBRcqMsT+v31pPH/sCbew3VcGoggGNJRVekvKK+5o= ; Message-ID: <20060925004959.58280.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [75.28.151.79] by web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:49:59 PDT Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:49:59 -0700 (PDT) From: backyard To: Jason Artz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:50:00 -0000 --- Jason Artz wrote: > > > --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" > wrote: > > > > > On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but > I > > only > > > have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to > > get > > > 6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under "Options, > > Release > > > name"), but I read that using an old sysinstall > to > > > install a new version is a bad idea. I cannot > > figure > > > out how to obtain a new sysinstall without > making > > boot > > > floppies (I have no floppy drive nor a CDRW). > Can > > I > > > install 5.3 and then somehow upgrade via FTP to > > 6.1? > > > Or download the new sysinstall to my 5.3 > > installation, > > > run it, and install 6.1 instead? What's the > best > > > method? > > > > Can you just download the 6.1 iso disks and make > new > > installer disks? > > > > Otherwise, you can install 5.3 and use cvsup to > > upgrade to 6.1 > > through a source upgrade. Just follow the > > instructions carefully. > > Is there a way to do a binary install instead of > downloading all the new sources and compiling them > as > an upgrade? I don't have a floppy or CDRW drive so > I > cannot burn new installer disks. I am stuck with > 5.3 > installer disks. It seems that there should be a > way > for me to do a fresh, binary install of 6.1 from > 5.3. > > > What if someone sent me a copy of 6.1s sysinstall > and > I ran it from the 5.3 environment? Would that allow > me to do a proper, fresh 6.1 install via FTP? I > have > tried installing 6.1 with my sysinstall and it will > not boot. > > Anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks, > Jason > > _______________________________________________ I thought if you went to the options in sysinstall and go to the part that says Release Name and it likely is going to say 5.3-RELEASE change that to 6.1-RELEASE and then do an ftp install. You should get the newer version of the system. I have used this to install 5.4-CURRENT in th past from 5.4 bootdisks. I would have to assume it should work for a newer release as the distribution is packed the same. I know this is how one would have sysinstall choose an arbirtrary custom built installation of FreeBSD from say an NFS mount. -brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 01:22:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE1616A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1493143D4C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:22:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.161.12]) by bay0-omc3-s10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:21:59 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:21:59 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:21:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Jack Stone" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:21:58 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2006 01:21:59.0307 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF572DB0:01C6E040] Subject: RE: Recompiling base sendmail with another DB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:22:00 -0000 >From: "Jack Stone" >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Recompiling base sendmail with another DB >Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:59:54 -0500 > >I've wanted to test the use of some of snertsoft's milters, but they >require a Berkley DB-4.1+ I believe instead of the 1.85 used by the base >system's sendmail. > Nevermind, I found my answer... no easy way. Thanks & sorry for the premature question. Jack _________________________________________________________________ Search—Your way, your world, right now! http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&FORM=WLMTAG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 01:24:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12BF16A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD66243D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D961A3C1F; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C925451309; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:24:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:24:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: backyard Message-ID: <20060925012457.GA51321@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060924211224.98572.qmail@web34309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060925004959.58280.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060925004959.58280.qmail@web83113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jason Artz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Want to install RELEASE-6.1, have 5.3 disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:59 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:49:59PM -0700, backyard wrote: > I thought if you went to the options in sysinstall and > go to the part that says Release Name and it likely is > going to say 5.3-RELEASE change that to 6.1-RELEASE > and then do an ftp install. You should get the newer > version of the system. I have used this to install > 5.4-CURRENT in th past from 5.4 bootdisks. I would > have to assume it should work for a newer release as > the distribution is packed the same. Nope, as the OP correctly states this will often not work. Your old release can't know all the special steps required to update to a newer release (files to not overwrite, etc). Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFFy/oWry0BWjoQKURAnzhAJ9hI0vUnQ9K5cHPEc+pbIhPWpoEWwCeIgpT q38qjL9wDh0EdQXhVN20liw= =TeQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 02:18:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A2916A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E343D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8P2HBUF074629; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:17:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8P2H70q074628; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:17:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:17:07 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Rob Gabaree Message-ID: <20060925021706.GA74471@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:18:27 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:18:27PM -0400, Rob Gabaree wrote: > Hi, > > I have a remote server that I don't plan on using for email as I have > another server to handle that. My question is.. is it a bad idea to > _completely_ disable sendmail on that machine? Right now /etc/ > rc.conf has: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > What you have disables incoming Email, but sstill lets the system send out Email. That is good, because the system sends notices about various things and you might want to send something from it sometimes - such as sending a file to yourself or whatever but without receiving anything. So, unless there is a very compelling reason, leave it the way it is. ////jerry > But I checked /var/log/maillog and saw about 5 archives of messages > that looked like this: > > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8I719YD078452: k8O71858063140: > return to sender: Cannot send message for 5 days > Sep 24 03:01:09 ny sendmail[63140]: k8O71858063140: to=postmaster, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=49386, relay= > [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > So what should I do? Should I just have "sendmail_enable="NO"" in / > etc/rc.conf, so only the incoming mail service is disabled? That way > messages could be sent without the above errors? Or what? > > Thanks for any help. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 06:12:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5D916A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA90543D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8P6BoFs009695; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:11:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k8P6BoFs009695 Message-ID: <45177321.2070903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:11:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert C Wittig References: <20060924214248.GC6395@zloy.stilyagin.com> <45171839.9020804@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <45171839.9020804@sbcglobal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:12:11 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1934/Mon Sep 25 05:28:46 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Rob Gabaree , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:12:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert C Wittig wrote: > Rob Gabaree wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable=3D"NO"` and in= >> /etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email addres= s: >> >> root user@mydomain.com >> >> I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as= >> well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. >> >> It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to >> my @mydomain.com email. >> >> Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? >=20 > I run OpenBSD on my mailservers, but I expect that the sendmail works > basically the same. >=20 > In /etc/rc.conf or its FreeBSD equivalent, check the sendmail line to > see if it references localhost.cf or sendmail.cf >=20 > localhost.cf will permit internal mail on the machine, so that root can= > send messages to your everyday UID, etc., but will not permit mail to b= e > sent to or received from, the Internet, or other machines in you LAN. >=20 > sendmail.cf will permit full Internet email, but even this will not > permit Internet email, unless your machine has a fully Qualified Domain= > Name, which is registered with your domain registrar, and has the > Registrar's MX setting configured properly. Uh -- the way OpenBSD deals with sendmail is a bit different to the way FreeBSD does. Under FreeBSD, rc.conf settings are used to prevent sendmail from listening on any network interfaces than the loopback. Otherwise exactly the same sendmail.cf would be used for either case. FreeBSD also has all of the machinery required to rebuild the .cf files from the .mc files setup and available directly from /etc/mail. The system defaults to creating $(hostname).mc and $(hostname).submit.mc files if none exist already and then turning those into sendmail.cf and submit.cf Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFF3Mm8Mjk52CukIwRCCg+AJ4o4gI9683r7ztvAjvIEDsn19xGGgCfb1OJ 9R6eE4EBqxUpA4Daj0jQ3SY= =ivGD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF93EC4F0F21D68A73E21156F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 06:27:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966E716A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5544E43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D11024AC45; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:27:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEAA4AC43; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:27:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:27:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: Marwan Sultan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060925022702.T55176@saturn.atopia.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:27:41 -0000 Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hi Matt! > > If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then > the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot > and thats all!! > if the file does not exist. then create it. > > add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any > upper level of shell. > > have fun, > Marwan Sultan > System Administrator. > >> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >> Matt Juszczak wrote: >> >> > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >> > restrict him to his home directory. >> > >> > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >> > get it working. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517000f901501537419863! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 07:21:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9469C16A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB1F43D64 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:21:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C3D623658A0; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1473658CD; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7F398D3; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4517838C.6090703@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:48 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: corwin@aeternal.net References: <20060924150810.H68311@saturn.atopia.net> <4516DBB6.3020701@aeternal.net> In-Reply-To: <4516DBB6.3020701@aeternal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matt Juszczak , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:21:58 -0000 Martin Hudec wrote: > Hello Matt, > > DefaultRoot ~ [group] > > where ~ are their specified homedirs and group is optional (members of > that group will be jailed to their homedirs, others will be able to > browse everywhere, if group is not used, everybody using proftpd will be > jailed). > > Martin pure-ftpd does this too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 07:35:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9005B16A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA2F43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd999@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1768331wxd for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:35:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=hx/ZzsR76ldQcM0q1UX3xNn/OM9N52R+CGXRxM8LoQ92P8qN7bheHMf/nDyFNTjtI3P9CDRnpmeZBquQ3LOPy+dYLWiO6LpeWOLlM933BSopl4Bw3CmOuX8bS3g6dNs9NQDWlB00XxCubeX6IdyzKagumHN8Sw5Do2CoExNHp0Y= Received: by 10.90.100.6 with SMTP id x6mr1146392agb; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.25.17 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:35:07 +0900 From: "azhar freebsd" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-question@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:35:09 -0000 hi can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. uname -a FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 [root@belagelo]~#emacs azhar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 08:23:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2CD16A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lomakin@softclub.by) Received: from mail.gis.com.by (mail.gis.com.by [193.232.248.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36D7143D55 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lomakin@softclub.by) Received: (qmail 26341 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 08:24:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scras) (postmaster@softclub.by@195.222.87.10) by mail.gis.com.by with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 08:24:24 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by scras (Kerio MailServer 6.1.3) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:23:08 +0300 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:23:07 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?Q?=C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9_=DE=2E_=CB=EE=EC=E0=EA=E8=ED?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.07) Professional Organization: SoftClub X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1445160694.20060925112307@softclub.by> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Howto zebra,balansing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?Q?=C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9_=DE=2E_=CB=EE=EC=E0=EA=E8=ED?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:23:54 -0000 Hi! I made vpn (ipsec) on FreeBSD 6.1. For providing uninterrupted network performance, I made reserve channel connection with ADSL modem, added routes, installed zebra package. But during testing the reserve channel connection is not UP after basic cha= nnel gets DOWN. Diagram: gif0(ipsec) +----------------+ net1 / \ net2 -------+ +-------- \ / \ / + ADSL----ADSL+ My zebra settings: ! ! Zebra configuration saved from vty ! 2006/09/14 14:06:20 ! hostname Router password ***** enable password ***** log file /var/log/zebra/zebra.log ! ! interface xl0 !ip address 192.168.166.107/24 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! interface ed0 ! ip address 192.168.1.1/24 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast=20 ! interface gif0 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! ip route 192.168.165.0/24 gif0 ip route 192.168.165.0/24 ed0 ip route 192.168.166.0/24 xl0 ! line vty ! My ospf settings: ! ! Zebra configuration saved from vty ! 2006/09/14 16:46:34 ! hostname ospfd password ***** log file /var/log/zebra/ospfd.log ! interface xl0 ! interface ed0 ! interface gif0 ip ospf network point-to-point ! router ospf ospf router-id 192.168.166.107 network 0.0.0.0/0 area 0.0.0.0 network 192.168.166.0/24 area 0 network 192.168.165.0/24 area 0 redistribute connected redistribute static line vty ! Help me, please. Eugene Lomakin. mailto:lomakin@softclub.by From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 09:16:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937E616A415 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A555B43D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id a10so305095qbd for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:16:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dmW/CcaN0ptv8GxPy53yKVMsiodkMwMXmNWeVZZkKSxWHD3y/WJHwX8wdalTWWXEt0LKl4JMN6W7n+VSAUyRWE+qXJe8WuqhNE0HCEG03DT7AMu+oUZz8z/XwL/sR3okxlIN+Qk5TUassbxsX/HsMy9JRCPjD62XBfbcthHOn6E= Received: by 10.35.10.17 with SMTP id n17mr7960616pyi; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.12 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:16:31 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "azhar freebsd" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: bd16cd1a98703e5e Cc: freebsd-question@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:16:33 -0000 On 9/25/06, azhar freebsd wrote: > hi > can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. > > uname -a > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > [root@belagelo]~#emacs When X-STABLE between X.Y and X.(Y+1) gets close to X.(Y+1), we call it X.(Y+1)-PRERELEASE instead of X.Y-STABLE. We're expecting 6.2 this November. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 10:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D916A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.7.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF34D43D73 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.nl with local; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:10:54 +0200 id 0003980A.4517AB2E.00003485 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:10:54 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20060925101054.GA13421@lothlorien.nagual.nl> References: <20060925022702.T55176@saturn.atopia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060925022702.T55176@saturn.atopia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:56 -0000 On 25 Sep Matt Juszczak wrote: > If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories > using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. > Is there anyway? Short answer: NO and that's OK for a protocol based on ssh. Your users can pass the bounderies of their homedirectories if they're logged in too, can they not? And ssh is nothing more than kind of a remote login; a bit more secure than rlogin was (is) -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ Solaris 10 6/06 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 10:48:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6596416A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF5E343D55 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:48:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felix.schalck@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2006 10:48:49 -0000 Received: from lns-bzn-55-82-255-182-167.adsl.proxad.net (EHLO [192.168.0.43]) [82.255.182.167] by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 12:48:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #23426003 Message-ID: <4517B414.4040600@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:48:52 +0200 From: "felix.schalck" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Smart Link PCI modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:48:51 -0000 Hi, Did anybody managed to get an integrated smart link modem working under freebsd 6.x ? thanks for help, Felix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 11:42:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EE816A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E4143D78 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from asahi-net.jp (l204142.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [218.219.204.142]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECCC15B13; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:41:31 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:41:31 +0900 From: Watanabe Kazuhiro To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20060925114131.BECCC15B13@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Cc: Vo?ten?k Vladim?r Subject: Re: freebsd 6.1 floppy installation problem - boot loader finds only 16MB, but I have 256 MB - and it hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:42:02 -0000 Hi. At Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:49:20 +0200, Vo?ten?k Vladim?r wrote: > I have an old HP NETSERVER PRO 2xpentium pro, 256 MB ram,=20 > and I tried to install the actual FREEBSD 6.1 there. I made 3=20 > floppies: boot, kernel1 and kernel2. When it starts booting from=20 > the boot floppy, the loader show I only have 16 MB of RAM=20 > (instead 256MB I have there). Then it asks for kernel1 and 2=20 > disk, and boot disk again. It gives me also the entry FREEBSD=20 > display with countdown - to choose boot type - default, no=20 > acpi, secure etc. I tried it all, but it alwaysl hangs after about 5=20 > second after any choice. So I must just reboot. I think it is just=20 > because the lack of RAM, because, I think it requirets at least 24=20 > MB of RAM. > I have found something about this on the web, that it is=20 > necessary options "MAXMEM=3Dn" to use all the RAM, because old=20 > BIOSes shows just first 16 MB or so, but I am just doing the=20 > installation. So how can I modify the kernel on the floppies to=20 > use such option during the installation from floppies? Or should I=20 > install from other media???Please can you help me with=20 > this??????How can I make the installation boot floppy see all the=20 > RAM I have? > Thank you very much for your reply. >=20 > Greetings >=20 > Vladim=EDr Vo=B9ten=E1k Choose "6. Escape to loader prompt" from the boot menu and enter the two lines to the loader(8) prompt: set hw.physmem=3D256M boot See loader(8) for details. It's the same thing that you specify "MAXMEM=3D256M" to your kernel configulation file. --- Watanabe Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 11:58:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7DA16A4A7 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven.brogame@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF2943D62 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:55:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steven.brogame@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2456959pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:55:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oGSQyFc1zbZWqriafWuxHwxvUw1VFawm0W56rr6A0Q5UPqJXQDf45vbfMiMVIyNUE5IgO3jAvWujdpJaZx0fbvDbq5cVIe2v4L13u3YHu/n4ullzobUCRMgEUtBaByyhk+pAc9pq0EosJfk08V8sFn3v7KB1K4Pb0q/w9ncdE1U= Received: by 10.35.72.1 with SMTP id z1mr8176928pyk; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.45.9 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10cbaf0f0609250455h4a3c737aw5f0138abc2dca535@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:55:54 +0800 From: steven To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Need help, some thing goes with wrong with Bridge-networking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:58:20 -0000 Dear Sir: Those days i tried build an in-line firewall, I take freebsd as a good operation system because it is safety and stabilty, but i came with trouble when i follow the handbook to bridge the two Ethernet Card, the book(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html) says that i should recomplie the kernel to add options BRIDGE into it, however, after compiling the new kernel, typing comamds including "sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1","sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.config=rl0,rl1", the bridge seems out of working, and my fressbsd system version is 6.1, those two network card is not assign any static ipv4 address, Can you tell me why it comes intn that, dieing to hrear from your answer, and i'm appriciate for it. yours steven From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:15:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BE516A47E for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: from smtp.eu.tiauto.com (smtp.eu.tiauto.com [195.127.176.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F370C43D49 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: by euex01.resource.tiauto.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:14:56 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Gouverneur, Thomas" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:14:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:15:10 -0000 Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 To: Marwan Sultan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > Hi Matt! > > If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then > the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot > and thats all!! > if the file does not exist. then create it. > > add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any > upper level of shell. > > have fun, > Marwan Sultan > System Administrator. > >> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >> Matt Juszczak wrote: >> >> > I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >> > restrict him to his home directory. >> > >> > I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >> > get it working. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517000f901501537419863! > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:37:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6948116A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7B9943D6A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from magalhj@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 6964 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AEt6ER/4k962J9hoqc4IZNAJeeJbsdql4u7vQ/QsKkj/AP4hnuPobdAxTmW7nqtWZzhywZ1gBqGxnANw3ks+H2Tf5zx6hIMp6Udj/RCYyWuR9RVWwKwRFsb/cgU13bAGjsUDC+DN08BHMwYQySIQXbn4zsSNm+Zc/MoVhrntTgE= ; Message-ID: <20060925123711.6962.qmail@web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.131.52.1] by web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 GMT Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Aguiar Magalhaes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: portupgrade doens't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:37:18 -0000 Hi list, I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the portupgrade doesn't work. ---> Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1' (archivers/arc) ---> Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make flags: BATCH=yes script: openpty: No such file or directory and so go on Could you help me? Aguiar _______________________________________________________ Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:41:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB36C16A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr (obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr [194.254.165.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A499743D78 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lecocq@lipn.univ-paris13.fr) Received: from [192.168.70.222] (addoo.math.univ-paris13.fr [194.254.165.54]) by obelix.math.univ-paris13.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA97E1CCC; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:41:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4517C9A2.7060303@lipn.univ-paris13.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:20:50 +0200 From: Le Cocq Michel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060831) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aguiar Magalhaes References: <20060925123711.6962.qmail@web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060925123711.6962.qmail@web31602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade doens't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:41:39 -0000 Have you done a "portsnap fetch update" before ? Aguiar Magalhaes a écrit : >Hi list, > >I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the >portupgrade doesn't work. > >---> Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1' >(archivers/arc) >---> Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make >flags: BATCH=yes >script: openpty: No such file or directory > >and so go on > >Could you help me? > >Aguiar > > > >_______________________________________________________ >Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! >http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:55:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDC716A49E for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from c.mx.poklib.org (c.mx.poklib.org [64.72.87.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1A643D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:55:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from [192.168.1.249] (port=62382 helo=mail.poklib.org) by c.mx.poklib.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRpzp-000LL2-QV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:41 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.218] by mail.poklib.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRpzs-000Gg8-RB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:44 -0400 X-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.88.4/1942 on c.mx.poklib.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4517D1D0.3080703@poklib.org> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:55:44 -0400 From: "B. Cook" Organization: Adriance Memorial Library User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RcvHost: [192.168.1.218] X-RcvFor: X-Auth-Id: X-AntiVirus: No Virus Found X-MIME-Character-set: ISO-8859-1 Subject: When to use SUID Perl (5.8.x)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:55:50 -0000 Hello, Just wondering what do you need suid perl for? I run a webserver for staff users, and have had no real need for it, and considering removing it. I think it goes to back the days when SA (possibly?) needed it and I just cp'd the make.conf across boxes over the years.. :) it is a security risk having it? Is the risk that if the webserver/webserver-app gets comprimised the user could use perl? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 12:39:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FA916A403 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E34FF43D58 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Sep 2006 12:39:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6q3Y4wH2cjQT0szOAihxiFVuuV63I/Xe3pabJd5mWdaEbG8cJuU8TEKIQLwkbudihp5ypy0Y4R0i042m6ScrDuvwomIBS/GJlQRPTW/HNOwLmZEnyLkl+Gqwv7HYGzNJWxqn1AFaG/YdCTvauFMdn4Z1601j42Wft68W6It1lOg= ; Message-ID: <20060925123908.20989.qmail@web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.65.68.246] by web88304.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:39:08 PDT Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael S To: FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:06:05 +0000 Subject: calendar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael S List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:39:09 -0000 Good day all. Where does one get an updated calendar.judaic? Mine seems to be out of sync. Thanks in advance. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 13:34:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3726416A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from saturn.atopia.net (saturn.atopia.net [72.36.141.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F7843D64 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 52AE94AC91; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511914AC8B; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:34:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:34:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: "Gouverneur, Thomas" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060925093407.E10466@saturn.atopia.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:34:41 -0000 rssh supports chroots it seems, but no way to actually tie them to their home dir. -Matt On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Gouverneur, Thomas wrote: > > Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh > > > Regards, > > -- > Thomas Gouverneur > Junior UNIX Administrator > TI Automotive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak > Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 > To: Marwan Sultan > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory > > Well... > > If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using > SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. > > I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can > connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. > > Is there anyway? > > -Matt > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > >> Hi Matt! >> >> If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then >> the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file > /etc/ftpchroot >> and thats all!! >> if the file does not exist. then create it. >> >> add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see > any >> upper level of shell. >> >> have fun, >> Marwan Sultan >> System Administrator. >> >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >>> Matt Juszczak wrote: >>> >>>> I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >>>> restrict him to his home directory. >>>> >>>> I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >>>> get it working. >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! >> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517c88b8285209328925! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 13:45:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129F816A47C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: from smtp.eu.tiauto.com (smtp.eu.tiauto.com [195.127.176.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A6543ED5 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tgouverneur@be.tiauto.com) Received: by euex01.resource.tiauto.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Gouverneur, Thomas" To: 'Matt Juszczak' Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:39:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:45:39 -0000 Correct, but you can still use it into a chroot. Consider: http://www.sdri.co.jp/rssh/CHROOT_en.html Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -----Original Message----- From: Matt Juszczak [mailto:matt@atopia.net] Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 15:35 To: Gouverneur, Thomas Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory rssh supports chroots it seems, but no way to actually tie them to their home dir. -Matt On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Gouverneur, Thomas wrote: > > Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh > > > Regards, > > -- > Thomas Gouverneur > Junior UNIX Administrator > TI Automotive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak > Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 > To: Marwan Sultan > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory > > Well... > > If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using > SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. > > I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can > connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. > > Is there anyway? > > -Matt > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: > >> Hi Matt! >> >> If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then >> the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file > /etc/ftpchroot >> and thats all!! >> if the file does not exist. then create it. >> >> add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see > any >> upper level of shell. >> >> have fun, >> Marwan Sultan >> System Administrator. >> >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) >>> Matt Juszczak wrote: >>> >>>> I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but >>>> restrict him to his home directory. >>>> >>>> I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to >>>> get it working. >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! >> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > !DSPAM:4517c88b8285209328925! > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 14:05:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435AD16A494 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD72443E3A for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:05:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so436184uge for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GwirGn3+p0F1evZS1gbayVuC95D7Qu13CYn++tubV2n0c6fgd0sf3XaWlNXjckpJ0MKliysQTWPNxHtT1+pyJj5RIh2Oh4I9+ZMPZZUJ+ho10d4UUyT4SHr5qL1J85B0k3DDSdc/eEQ39TK5SYnHa/8XmQC5Y2h6zZ2o3YEKcco= Received: by 10.67.103.7 with SMTP id f7mr3373971ugm; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.224.6 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:04:52 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" To: justin , "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20060925013537.I43034@justnosweat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060925013537.I43034@justnosweat.net> Cc: Subject: Re: lpd hewlett packard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:05:26 -0000 On 9/25/06, justin wrote: > > Hello, Hello, > Now i ask myself what the /boot/device.hints file has to do with my > kernel. > What sort of file is /boot/device.hints and why do i have to rebuild my > kernel. man device.hints(5) > Thanks inadvance, > Justin. -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 14:34:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA99B16A415 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@pepcross.com) Received: from mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59BF43D4C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@pepcross.com) Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.47]) by mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2006 15:34:05 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AQAAAG+DF0WBT4ojAQECBwIMBwYd Received: from 88-106-206-226.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.106.206.226]:62971 helo=mail.pepcross.com) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GRrWx-000CU3-KJ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:33:59 +0000 Received: by mail.pepcross.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:33:55 +0100 From: "Steve Roome" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:33:55 +0100 To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20060925143355.GA1110@zebedee.home> References: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon >R300 3d support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:34:09 -0000 On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:39:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 9/23/06, Steve Roome wrote: > >Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and > >newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's > >been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. > > > >So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org > >port, or when that will be updated. > > xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some > basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. What do you mean by basic support ? My PCIE X700 now has semi working 3D acceleration - glx and working dri working well enough to play with a few OpenGL apps, I've gone so far as to actually set some of the reallyslick screensavers up - and most work okay, well, not all, some of them whine about the odd issue, but there is limited 3D acceleration here. The 6.9 in the ports gave me only 2D acceleration, as expected, no DRI no glx etc. So, which version of 7.x is coming into the ports, and what version of the ati driver will be coming in with it ? Ta, Steve Roome From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 14:53:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D101816A40F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yarosh@4web.pl) Received: from sauron.4web.pl (sauron.4web.pl [193.239.206.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429DA43D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yarosh@4web.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sauron.4web.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72378A0D0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:49:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (net133-186.4web.pl [194.63.133.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sauron.4web.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CA38A03C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4517ED4C.6030106@4web.pl> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:00 +0200 From: jarek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned: 4WEB.PL AntiVir/AntiSpam Scanner Cc: Subject: freeBSD official font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:53:03 -0000 hi can you tell me what is name of "freeBSD" font? i would like to do some artworks to promote freebsd and i beadly need this font bye -- Pozdrawiam, Jarek Berecki From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:14:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF23E16A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6488343D64; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8PFCpI9078358; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:12:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k8PFCpvd078357; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:12:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:12:51 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: azhar freebsd Message-ID: <20060925151251.GB78251@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-question@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:14:09 -0000 On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:35:07PM +0900, azhar freebsd wrote: > hi > can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. Just what it says. It is a FreeBSD 6.2 that has not been officially released yet. The present official release is 6.1. The 6.2 release is coming soon and is being worked on actively. You can install it for testing or development or somewhat risky production use. It is sort of a beta release. ////jerry > > uname -a > FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep > 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 > root@belagelo.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 > [root@belagelo]~#emacs > > > azhar > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:26:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272B16A416 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBF843D60 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:23145 helo=remailer.aseed.net) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GRsLR-000MXc-HH for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:09 +0000 Received: from mail.aseed.net (unknown [192.168.0.48]) by remailer.aseed.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 39508E2537 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <11b6672e61bc26570f3cb9c407d80af1@aseed.net> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:26:20 +0200 From: "albi" To: X-Mailer: Hastymail 1.5 x-priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: albi@scii.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:26:15 -0000 hi, i don't like sendmail very much, but have been happily using postfix=20 for years now, on a freebsd mailserver with jails i was wondering whether the following is possible : - all incoming email goes to 1 jail which only runs sendmail + milter and blocks all email with .gif attachments - sendmail then let's through all other emails with some transport-map which doesn't need individual aliases (per user) - other jails (separate jail for lists and email) accept the email via postfix can sendmail do this ? or is there other mailserver-software which can block gif and hand over all email to other jails with postfix i'm asking this for the following reasons : - i have a jail with postfix+mysql+spamassassin+maildrop, esp. the maildrop-part took me many many hours to figure out, (turned out that courier maildrop default mysql-support was dropped in favour for courier authdaemon+mysql-support) it's working fine now, so i prefer not to add more to this jail, but i'd like to stop .gif-images attached now - it looks like postfix needs per user aliases for transport-situation to virtual domains (or am i missing something ?) possible or not good ? thanks in advance for useful info! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:31:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263BD16A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arindam.mukerjee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981E443D79 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arindam.mukerjee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2528645pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:31:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=aU8Ap4M5aGp4mBcSv9kjtMuZq9ml0gns8AZhwwr5XK1ZTxEMb8qok/qgdXpG0of+0QCsQt8Td9ziyFfAxMiMztAp2Nn2Qmd7QDQe9yTRz2KRyyQCVZZ91gfu9rbySe2ryjnyRHJZ2P+EM4X7M6yaHXOrlR0IFswlNAPDmRbdOsw= Received: by 10.35.78.9 with SMTP id f9mr7990678pyl; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.13.5 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:01:10 +0530 From: Arindam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:31:29 -0000 I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from such efforts already expended. It would be great if you could give some idea through examples. Cheers, Andy -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:37:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B1C16A417 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:37:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from c.mx.poklib.org (c.mx.poklib.org [64.72.87.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BFB43D7B for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bcook@poklib.org) Received: from [192.168.1.249] (port=62540 helo=mail.poklib.org) by c.mx.poklib.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRsVq-000Juf-Tj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.218] by mail.poklib.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60; FreeBSD) (envelope-from ) id 1GRsVu-000Cra-0p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:58 -0400 X-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.88.4/1942 on c.mx.poklib.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4517F79A.40003@poklib.org> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:36:58 -0400 From: "B. Cook" Organization: Adriance Memorial Library User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RcvHost: [192.168.1.218] X-RcvFor: X-Auth-Id: X-AntiVirus: No Virus Found X-MIME-Character-set: ISO-8859-1 Subject: Exim As MTA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:37:08 -0000 I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a "Message failure - message too big" in my inbox for root. (looks like from daily run output) A message that you sent was longer than the maximum size allowed on this system. It was not delivered to any recipients. ------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. ------ No more than 100K characters of the body are included. it is soo large b/c of all the rejected mail: I do want to see the mail due to the messages in the queue.. but how do I get it not to show me rejected mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:58:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDED16A416 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1875D43D70 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:58:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k8PFwero013905; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:58:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:58:39 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Arindam Message-ID: <20060925155839.GF73717@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:58:46 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 25), Arindam said: > I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question > on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. > > Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] > double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How > does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. Different comparison operators, basically, and faster than [ because it doesn't have to fork /bin/[ . > You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from > such efforts already expended. They're all documented in the manpage ("ksh93" for the shells/ksh93 ports), under Conditional Expressions. Compare them with the "test" manpage. It looks like FreeBSD's test command does most of what ksh does, except for the wildcard matching of =, which is handy but can be emulated with a case statement :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 16:10:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1D716A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB5743D45 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8PGA0U8060795; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:10:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060925110339.021a7c68@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:09:42 -0500 To: Arindam , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:20 -0000 The [[ ]] operators are for compound tests, the [ ] operator is for simple tests. In ksh newer than 6/3/86 the [[ ]] makes the [ ] obsolete. Example of [[ ]]: [[ foo > bar && $PWD -ef . ]] && print foobar foobar That is from the kornshell book co-written by David Korn. By the way, I use ksh for my root's shell and it works fine. -Derek At 10:31 AM 9/25/2006, Arindam wrote: >I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question >on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. > >Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] >double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How >does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. > >You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from >such efforts already expended. > >It would be great if you could give some idea through examples. > >Cheers, >Andy >-- >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 16:53:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1761816A407 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D9343D58 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2552145pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=THmSLYkn84GltdFwYqUqXtkNIk23vuaETOlRkN6/1jtl5NJ68NogcKgridfiaT/rQq2AthNXwxAw9IemAP+sxT2ZK/i7JvWEQ7F9us50osBENOXIT5fJGSXdWwI2Rwk0Ys6ZpCA2psofaR1DqbbGyN2ELVUhFmHCaIDu9FlCdow= Received: by 10.35.17.12 with SMTP id u12mr8134278pyi; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.12 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:52:55 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Steve Roome" In-Reply-To: <20060925143355.GA1110@zebedee.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060923140057.GA1286@zebedee.home> <20060925143355.GA1110@zebedee.home> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3fbba1503253e555 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Radeon >R300 3d support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:53:04 -0000 On 9/25/06, Steve Roome wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:39:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 9/23/06, Steve Roome wrote: > > >Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and > > >newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's > > >been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. > > > > > >So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org > > >port, or when that will be updated. > > > > xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some > > basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. > > What do you mean by basic support ? My PCIE X700 now has semi working > 3D acceleration - glx and working dri working well enough to play with > a few OpenGL apps, I've gone so far as to actually set some of the > reallyslick screensavers up - and most work okay, well, not all, some > of them whine about the odd issue, but there is limited 3D acceleration > here. I mean, FWIW, that 6.9 has basic support for 3D on my 9550. 6.8 doesn't and I heard that 7.0 has much better support. > The 6.9 in the ports gave me only 2D acceleration, as expected, no DRI > no glx etc. > > So, which version of 7.x is coming into the ports, and what version of > the ati driver will be coming in with it ? 7.1, the one that's bundled. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 19:13:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84A816A412 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from mail.attiksystem.ch (f29.attiksystem.ch [212.147.59.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3B543D46 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) Received: from poweredge.attiksystem.ch (poweredge.attiksystem.ch [10.0.0.29]) by mail.attiksystem.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8PJDuh7035337; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from philippe.lang@attiksystem.ch) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340" Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:13:56 +0200 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Message-ID: <6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D12A1@poweredge.attiksystem.ch> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question Thread-Index: Acbgt0At84c0Q5/GSSmp30G/Cq5jgAAHuqXg From: "Philippe Lang" To: , X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 10.0.0.111 Cc: Subject: RE: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:13:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > hi, > > i don't like sendmail very much, but have been happily using > postfix for years now, > > on a freebsd mailserver with jails i was wondering whether > the following is possible : > > - all incoming email goes to 1 jail which only runs > sendmail + milter and blocks all email with .gif attachments > - sendmail then let's through all other emails with some transport-map > which doesn't need individual aliases (per user) > - other jails (separate jail for lists and email) accept the email > via postfix > > can sendmail do this ? or is there other mailserver-software > which can block gif and hand over all email to other jails > with postfix > > i'm asking this for the following reasons : > > - i have a jail with postfix+mysql+spamassassin+maildrop, > esp. the maildrop-part took me many many hours to figure out, > (turned out that courier maildrop default mysql-support was dropped > in favour for courier authdaemon+mysql-support) > it's working fine now, so i prefer not to add more to this jail, > but i'd like to stop .gif-images attached now > - it looks like postfix needs per user aliases for transport-situation > to virtual domains (or am i missing something ?) > > possible or not good ? Hi, Is there a specific reason why you absolutely want to keep sendmail? Why don't you do everything with postfix, and a content filtering tool you haven't mentioned: amavis? Jails runs all of the software you mentioned just fine. Just remember to bind on the IP of your jail. --------------- Philippe Lang Attik System ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII/zCCAocw ggHwoAMCAQICEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA2MDYyMjE3MzE0NloXDTA3MDYyMjE3MzE0 NlowZzENMAsGA1UEBBMETGFuZzERMA8GA1UEKhMIUGhpbGlwcGUxFjAUBgNVBAMTDVBoaWxpcHBl IExhbmcxKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAOfvCPREDwfIbzsNRoyBDoSOWfI2NNWdRRMJXuj5ldF22gSQ 6MiXFUjt4HlRIwPb8x13hrv89GW/SmLjFThxf7NKZ8dPTZzp4ZlvrQBRAYhSuTQOJ8azyzruZu54 Ak7fa3pz26Q3B8kg4knZBz3O9Q4K1tK8AEdjNQpyDg/iDdzjAgMBAAGjOTA3MCcGA1UdEQQgMB6B HHBoaWxpcHBlLmxhbmdAYXR0aWtzeXN0ZW0uY2gwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF AAOBgQAAzz+I6MrhWjbfWSgngW/DthHvXiTR6x0cCeb4T5mBb5dgueqgLnrh/2blsbCQuLWh0URe /1l/QQ2dY2elG3PEDPv9cCl/LcwsCsE1Nj3bGM4gdVx9crYvTw5dyyUuDq1KShV3uziE+o5Lyfx4 qWRYd6/yIBDVarohdpL8J0DJczCCAy0wggKWoAMCAQICAQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw05NjAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDEy MzEyMzU5NTlaMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBANRp19SwlGRbcelH2AxRtupykbCEXn0tDY97Et+FJXUodDpC LGMnn5V7S+9+GYcdhuqj3bnOlmQawhRuRKx85o/oTQ9xH0A4pgCjh3j2+ZSGXq3qwF5269kUo11u enwMpUtVfwYZKX+emibVars4JAhqmMex2qOYkf152+VaxBy5AgMBAAGjEzARMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQF MAMBAf8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAx+ySfk749ZalZ2IqpPBNEWDQb41gWGGsJrtSNVwIzzD7 qEqWih9iQiOMFw/0umScF6xHKd+dmF7SbGBxXKKs3Hnj524ARx+1DSjoAp3kmv0T9KbZfLH43F8j JgmRgHPQFBveQ6mDJfLmnC8Vyv6mq4oHdYsM3VGEa+T40c53ooEwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN MDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5o wHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH 5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7 AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8v Y3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYw KQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NW IXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIC+DCCAvQCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZy ZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEEdYYafa1wkm0CP4DOffAiswCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAdgwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwOTI1MTkxMzUyWjAjBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQQxFgQUNbUn3B3niW0rkiPEXdJbDBjm+gcwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggqhkiG9w0D BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw BwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJJtAj+Azn3wIrMIGHBgsqhkiG9w0BCRAC CzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0 ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhBHWGGn2tcJ JtAj+Azn3wIrMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGACOX5qyCHhfjiM9Akf4XgLGZbsIOOrn0WedUS5qCa h3LDNZG0BrOdYWFKRcV92/eOH6Re93ssezYrnupSMatslt85RU5tgYVtVEk5bnS6zmhflqsvUbLd YC+rEg8W6SH7y370K0mQTswE/Y3OTA7QydXbYEAmXjJ4rUwOwpwk+F0AAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C6E0E7.80867340-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 19:42:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD66F16A416 for