From owner-freebsd-qa  Sat Sep  9 15:19:43 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 19E6337B422; Sat,  9 Sep 2000 15:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bonsai.hiwaay.net (tnt6-216-180-4-137.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.4.137])
	by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e89MJM703960;
	Sat, 9 Sep 2000 17:19:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by bonsai.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) id e89MJKQ36312;
	Sat, 9 Sep 2000 17:19:20 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from steve)
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 17:19:20 -0500
From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp
Subject: Re: Making XFree86-4 the default
Message-ID: <20000909171920.J2089@bonsai.hiwaay.net>
References: <200009091343.e89Dhg411508@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200009091343.e89Dhg411508@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:43:42AM -0700
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:43:42AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote:
# Hi,
# 
# What do you guys think about making XFree86-4-* the default now?  With
# the split-up XFree86-4 ports and the xtt-* servers (which are
# basically 3.3.6 servers plus TrueType patches), I think everyone can
# have a reasonable system.

The only concern that I would have is about all the complaints
about 4.x not supporting enough video cards besides being generally
buggy.

-steve


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message