Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:52:07 +0800
From:      Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Teach mdmfs about tmpfs and use tmpfs in rc scripts
Message-ID:  <CAHNYxxNSjNMg8hMGL2d%2B223P6gwFJUU%2Bdxnbqcz08SR5A-JDFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1394148413.1149.348.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References:  <1394148413.1149.348.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Thoughts?
>

Is it ok to default mdmfs to tmpfs behavior? Not sure if anyone would
like to have explicit allocation e.g. failing early on insufficient memory,
rather than failing on write. If so then at least 'md' should be in the
options in addition to 'auto' and 'tmpfs' when both md and tmpfs are
available from kernel.


-Jia-Shiun.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHNYxxNSjNMg8hMGL2d%2B223P6gwFJUU%2Bdxnbqcz08SR5A-JDFQ>