From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 19:20:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5C2106564A; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from cell.p6m7g8.net (static-71-178-236-107.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.236.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFE68FC14; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net [174.79.184.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by cell.p6m7g8.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5OJK8M5080509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:20:08 GMT (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Message-ID: <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:20:06 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100607 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pav Lucistnik References: <4C235CE4.3060800@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C235CE4.3060800@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on cell.p6m7g8.net Cc: pgollucci@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AP_FAST_BUILD problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:20:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/10 13:25, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Hi, > > your recent sweep to convert mod_* ports to AP_FAST_BUILD can lead to > hard to detect runtime problems, when the module consists from more than > one .c file. We just hit tis on mod_layout22 here at my job. > > You might want to do a pass over all ports you changed, and revert when > needed. > I don't disagree, but you'll have to give me more info for why. The whole point of apxs is that it can handle or or more .c files. The specific error you see in layout22 would be of much use. Fortunately, I think on 2-4 ports would be affected. - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFMI6/ldbiP+9ubjBwRApARAJ93HqFG3Pb887VQ2kbMvuqRQJ+u8QCfSAW1 nYfqI3Phbz7fBYkxD2RKbuI= =KVHM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----