From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 23 17:52:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5838437B400 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18608177EA7 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 19:52:18 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <030601c085a8$491e5b20$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: References: <20010123174558.A427@gecko.eric.net.au> <3A6D4A30.806FCCFD@quake.com.au> <20010123202310.A72951@cokane.yi.org> Subject: Hard drive errors Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 19:52:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is freebsd any better at handling bad sectors/blocks than it was around 2.2.8/3.0? Just curious, because I remember it not handling them too good. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message