Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 15:25:06 +0200 From: Matthew West <mwest@uct.ac.za> To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@velocet.ca> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sandboxed bind. Message-ID: <19991114152506.A36773@apotheosis.za.org> In-Reply-To: <14382.11991.536272.989358@trooper.velocet.net>; from "David Gilbert" on Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 10:39:03PM References: <bulk.47978.19991113192456@hub.freebsd.org> <14382.11991.536272.989358@trooper.velocet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 10:39:03PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > I went through the motions to sandbox bind. My only real complaint was that > named-xfer was dynamically loaded (greatly increasing the cruft that had to > be in the sandbox). I found it much easier (and neater) to compile "named-xfer" as a static binary. This is described briefly at http://www.antisocial.net/~modred/papers/named.html > Is there an easy way to determine exactly what libraries are required by an > executable, BTW? "ldd" -- mwest@uct.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991114152506.A36773>