From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 05:16:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF69416A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EABE43D3F for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so1150370rne for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:16:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=j2ExVsXdsPulPdpcCnxRwKu+B0ma6ZDzcEgbLO6zfKdWhwmxFdiXy52JJ8tM7ZdJCycco8kPezBkbAxvHpe8oHgKRWq4C/lXMIvXsXWU5Qwxh1jhQvVD/U+1ROxCIColfVTiZIbqRZSkshnWKW9BDn3o36aYHEKji2Mv82H/T2Y= Received: by 10.38.161.28 with SMTP id j28mr214531rne; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.39.1.22 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:16:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0502012116fecb8d6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:45 +0000 From: Chris To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0502012116458a6154@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3aaaa3a0501060612502ce616@mail.gmail.com> <20050106223854.GA97444@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a0501081243395726d2@mail.gmail.com> <20050121175219.GA9829@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a050121124314b6d041@mail.gmail.com> <20050201031509.GA32624@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a05020105184b175d4b@mail.gmail.com> <20050201153718.GA43352@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a0502012116458a6154@mail.gmail.com> Subject: re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 05:16:46 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Chris Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 +0000 Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug To: Bosko Milekic 0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented out) is auto. Or at least the docs say that. If I am wrong the docs need updating and it is defenitly a bug as netstat -m output is different. Chris On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +0000, Chris wrote: > > Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance > > difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and > > its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% > > worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is > > any specific types of tests you want doing. > > > > Chris > > I'm not sure I understand. Setting it to zero _means_ "auto." > > I'll likely commit the patch. Thanks. > > -- > Bosko Milekic > bmilekic@technokratis.com > bmilekic@FreeBSD.org >