Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:52:10 +0200
From:      Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
To:        ticso@cicely.de
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?
Message-ID:  <41DFEC72-FA4B-4065-B057-D29EF43BD494@cs.huji.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <20170125084738.GM85666@cicely7.cicely.de>
References:  <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125081318.GT13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125084738.GM85666@cicely7.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 10:47, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>=20
>>>> 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit
>>>> drastic, there's a point to it.
>>>=20
>>> With that argument only the latest version would be supported.
>>=20
>> https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ lists the supported releases.
>> There are no release candidates listed.
>>=20
>>> That said, it is a release candidate and as such one could argue =
that
>>> there never had been any official support at all.
>>> In that case however the message is wrong, because when a support =
has
>>> ended it implies that there was support.
>>>=20
>>> The check in the code is this one:
>>> .if (${OPSYS} =3D=3D FreeBSD && (${OSVERSION} < 1003000 || =
(${OSVERSION} >=3D 1100000 && ${OSVERSION} < 1100122))) || \
>>>    (${OPSYS} =3D=3D DragonFly && ${DFLYVERSION} < 400400)
>>>=20
>>> It is not about RC as such, it is explicitly about 11.0-RC.
>>> My OSVERSION is 1100121.
>>> So obviously support starts with the first release.
>>> Fair enough, but then the message is still wrong unless it was =
supported.
>>=20
>> What's stopping you from upgrading to -REL ?
>=20
> Buildworld on a raspberry isn't fun - if it works at all.
> Even if you crossbuild and just copy the binaries, the wear of
> MicroSD cards isn't something you want to test unless you really
> have to.

most of the time this works for me:
	mount host:/export-to-rpi/local /usr/local
	echo =E2=80=98WRKDIRPREFIX=3D/var/tmp=E2=80=99 >> /etc/make.conf
	mount via nfs /var/tmp, i.e.
		mount host:/export-to-rpi/tmp  /var/tmp
	also add swap via nfs:
		mount host:/export-to-rpi/swap /mnt-swap
		swapon /mnt-swap




>=20
> --=20
> B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de <mailto:bernd@bwct.de>> http://www.bwct.de =
<http://www.bwct.de/>;
> Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm =
<https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>;
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org =
<mailto:freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41DFEC72-FA4B-4065-B057-D29EF43BD494>