From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Jan 17 21:39:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D75015032 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:39:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA66814; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:39:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA14475; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:39:44 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001180539.WAA14475@harmony.village.org> To: "Frank (sysadmin)" Subject: Re: 4.0 Code freeze? Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:44:45 +0100." <20000117084445.A11343@student.rug.ac.be> References: <20000117084445.A11343@student.rug.ac.be> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:39:43 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <20000117084445.A11343@student.rug.ac.be> "Frank (sysadmin)" writes: : So maybe this is the moment to make sure we won't need a separate PAO for 4.0? That moment was six months ago. No one seemed concerned about it then. There will likely be not much more additional support in 4.0 for the "oldcard" pccard than we have right now. The general consensus that I've seen on nomads is to not waste efforts doing a 4.0 PAO, but rather devote those efforts to newcard and 5.0. any 4.x support will be on a MFC basis. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message