Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:59:50 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.0.20060914075326.1590ce90@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <86k646lr1m.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200609130839.k8D8dGt9063305@repoman.freebsd.org> <7.0.1.0.0.20060913081925.08da2b20@sentex.net> <86k646lr1m.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:45 AM 9/14/2006, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
>Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
> > At 04:39 AM 9/13/2006, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > MFC: CPUTYPE support for VIA C3
> > Does anything currently make use of V3 specific optimizations ?
>
>I don't understand the question...
Sorry, C3. i.e. If I add the VIA C3 as the CPU=20
type in my make.conf, what are the benefits ? I=20
did a quick grep through the RELENG_6 source tree=20
and didnt find anything obvious. I make use of=20
the padlock module and the openssl padlock crypto=20
engine but the cpu optimizations were there=20
already. I was just wondering if you knew of any additional benefits.
---Mike
>DES
>--
>Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7.0.1.0.0.20060914075326.1590ce90>