From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 10 16:15:44 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA15479 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 16:15:44 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA15440 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 16:15:26 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA19753 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Fri, 10 Feb 1995 18:04:50 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA23108; 10 Feb 95 18:03:35 CST (Fri) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id SAA23105; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 18:03:35 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199502110003.SAA23105@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: MIT SHM X11 extensions? (fwd) To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 18:03:35 -0600 (CST) Cc: davidg@Root.COM, jmb@kryten.atinc.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9502101411.AA10760@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 10, 95 07:11:20 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 429 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Actually, you could fault the whole image to swap and close the > reference to the file -- and just allow the write, with never an > ETXTBUSY to be seen. I consider the sudden explosion of swap utilization to be a surprising consequence, especially considering the size of some images. When you're writing to an image you're likely replacing it with "install" anyway. Let "install" detect the ETXTBSY and do a little shuffle.