Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:30:16 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>, FreeBSD Questions !!!! <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Noob question ....
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410152027010.81686@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141016020025.27547cc0.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <543F041D.7030206@hiwaay.net> <20141016013646.34d542e6.freebsd@edvax.de> <543F0863.60205@hiwaay.net> <20141016020025.27547cc0.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Polytropon wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:50:59 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>> *Aaaaaaaaack* !!!! That clarifies an important misunderstanding for me
>> .... I thought STABLE would be more/most stable, maybe a refinement on
>> RELEASE .... Thx for the clarification.
>
> The name -STABLE is to be understood as "more stable than
> -CURRENT", because when you check out the development branch,
> it _might_ happen that it misbehaves or that it won't even
> compile; it can also happen that an experimental feature
> in -CURRENT is being removed later on.

-STABLE means the ABI is stable.  So applications compiled for 9.1 will 
still run on 9-STABLE, and vice versa.

In effect, the -STABLE branch ends up being -RELEASE plus bug fixes and 
new features, the continued development after a release.  Where a 
-RELEASE is a snapshot in time, -STABLE is the latest version of that 
branch.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1410152027010.81686>