From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org  Fri Jun 14 19:13:19 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C97515AF438
 for <freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:13:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org)
Received: from uucp.dinoex.org (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [IPv6:2001:1440:5001:1::2])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67FD775B56
 for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:13:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org)
Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2])
 by uucp.dinoex.org (8.16.0.41/8.16.0.41) with ESMTPS id x5EJD4fu047755
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:13:05 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org)
Received: from citylink.dinoex.sub.org (uucp@localhost)
 by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.16.0.41/8.16.0.41/Submit) with UUCP id x5EJD4ep047754;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org)
Received: from gate.oper.dinoex.org (gate-e [192.168.98.2])
 by citylink.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5EIk2Oi006335;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:46:02 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from peter@gate.oper.dinoex.org)
Received: from gate.oper.dinoex.org (gate-e [192.168.98.2])
 by gate.oper.dinoex.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x5EIjufI006274;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:45:56 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from peter@gate.oper.dinoex.org)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
 by gate.oper.dinoex.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x5EIjuPA006273;
 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:45:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from peter)
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:45:55 +0200
From: Peter <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Cc: "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ipfw: switching sets does stall the machine
Message-ID: <20190614184555.GA5959@gate.oper.dinoex.org>
References: <20190614153302.GA4503@gate.oper.dinoex.org>
 <CAOjFWZ7nYmP3i77_2UiS1O6ak4M8=B9tyPPMFPxTrpMdE-mhZw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ7nYmP3i77_2UiS1O6ak4M8=B9tyPPMFPxTrpMdE-mhZw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; Sender-ip: 194.45.71.2;
 Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; )
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2
 (uucp.dinoex.org [194.45.71.2]); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:13:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:13:19 -0000

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:21:52AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:

! > Details:
! > Machine : i386
! > OS      : FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p10
! > Command : ipfw set disable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 enable 16
! >                 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
! >
! 
! Can't speak to this specific lockup, but I'm curious to know if it works
! when you enable first, then disable (it's how we've used sets here at work).

Tried that already, it doesn't make a difference. And since
the operation is said to be atomically, it should not make a
difference.

But now I have an idea what might be the actual issue. One more try
for proof, and I send this message out first as otherwise it will be lost...