From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 1 12:09:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id E96E71065670; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:09:02 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Gary Jennejohn , Marcelo Araujo , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090701120902.GA14654@FreeBSD.org> References: <200906301428.n5UESfiF022149@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090701073752.GA79351@FreeBSD.org> <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:09:03 -0000 Marcelo Araujo wrote: > Another thing, the version that was submitted by GNATS is different of the > latest version. And as the maintainer knows the port better than me, and I > didn't have any additional effort to send a mail to he, was a good thing to > do. Ah, that explains it. It just wasn't obvious from commit log that version proposed in the PR is different from one actually committed. ./danfe