From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 28 19:38:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC1816A41A; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flata@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BB013C4DD; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flata@magnesium.net) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1212) id 0A8A5DA840; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:40:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:40:09 -1000 From: Juli Mallett To: Yar Tikhiy Message-ID: <20080128194008.GA55830@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20080127043334.GA75235@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080127053813.GH49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <20080127094653.GA74753@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080128053514.GK49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <86odb6usm6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080128161300.GP49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <86prvluc33.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080128170128.GS49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <20080128182827.GA53020@toxic.magnesium.net> <20080128190705.GU49535@comp.chem.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080128190705.GU49535@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, David O'Brien , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:38:50 -0000 * Yar Tikhiy [ 2008-01-28 ] [ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h ] > But, hey, have you seen the diffs in the first place? You seem to > assume that my commit was only to kill the innocent int64_t. Yes, actually. I found some of the decisions strange, the work overall worthwhile and the "long long" change particularly gauche. Several others have said things that I thought at the time, and I was following the discussion closely. (Your bogus standards reasoning was, in particular, a red flag, and I suspect that that caught some people off-guard since your reasoning is fallacious and that you would have gotten less grief for the change if you had given less strange justifications (even no justifications) initially.) You said that you had received no back-out request, so I made one. Instead of acknowledging that you had now received a single backout request which you would not honor (and I was only referring to the "long long" bit, for clarity), you chose to grouch that I was rehashing old points (I do not believe backout requests should come without reasoning attached.) Thanks, Juli.