Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:53:22 -0500 From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> To: opentrax@email.com, dr@kyx.net Cc: tcpdump-workers@tcpdump.org, ethereal-dev@ethereal.com, snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!? Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.0.20001216124841.01e27c20@mail.etinc.com> In-Reply-To: <200012121436.GAA03155@spammie.svbug.com> References: <0012072118150Q.09615@smp.kyx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Im confused as to what difference it makes? No production server should ever use bpf for any "performance" oriented function anyway. Plus if you are doing network testing you should write to dev/null or a ram disk or better yet dump the packets rather than store them, Every disk will be different so you need to get that variable out of the equation. DB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.0.25.0.20001216124841.01e27c20>