Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Feb 1997 00:25:40 -0800 (PST)
From:      Stranger Bone <ben@narcissus.ml.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kkenn@bns.com.au>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Mounting win995 partitions
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.970205001417.21350A-100000@narcissus.ml.org>
In-Reply-To: <199702050701.RAA22708@topdown.bns.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> Okay, I've just been reading through the archives to try and answer my 
> questions, and have got somewhere but not 100% certain on some things.
> 
> Basically, I want to mount my win95 partitions under freebsd (2.1.0-Rel). 
> When I first installed bsd, I made the mistake of trying to mount the 95 
> partition read/write, and got the "root directory is not a multiple of 
> the clustersize in length" msg and trashed the entire partition :-(. 
> Henceforth I've been tentative at mounting at eagain, even read-only, 
> since I also had an experience with a port of unarj (possibly not a 2.1.0 
> port, which might have been the problem) trashing large parts of my /usr 
> partition when I tried to unarj a file I copied from my read-only msdos drive. 
> Thankfully I was able to recover from this without too much hassle, but 
> I'd rather not go through it again. Was this likely to be related to a 
> buggy mount, unarj, or something else?

mount_msdos is buggy enough to hose a UFS partition, read-only or not.
 
> Incidentally, my win95/freebsd drive was partitioned with FIPS, which may 
> have been the cause of the problem. It's also a fairly large partition, 
> 1GB+, I think. From what I gather, both of these things are relevant.

I believe they are; I gather that it's something to do with FIPS not
resetting the cluster size properly.  I wish this bug were better
documented, it's a mean one and there's I think there's only a vague
warning in the man page. 

> Now, I gather that it's possible to reorganize things to allow me to 
> mount it writable under certain configurations. Is this the case, and if 
> so, exactly how should I go about this? I've just bought another 2.5GB 

I would love to know the answer to that.

> IDE HD which I'm planning on also splitting win95/bsd. Before I do this, how 
> should I set it up so as to maximise performance and preferably allow me 
> to mount the win95 partition(s) read/write. I'm thiniing of keeping 300MB 
> or so for bsd and keeping the rest for win95.

Depends what you're doing with FreeBSD.  In general I think it's good to 
have /usr on one hard drive and swap on another, so you can access both 
concurrently.  But it really depends what you're using the machine for.

> Your replies would be most appreciated!

I hope this helps.

> || ,-./\ Kris Kennaway || "Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead.   ||
> ||/     \              ||  Dead. Dead. Dead. How can you apologize to them?" ||
> ||\_,-*_/ kkenn@       || "I..can't" "Then how can I forgive?"               ||
> ||     v    bns.com.au || - G'Kar and Vir, "Comes the Inquisitor", Babylon 5 ||
> 



 Ben

"You have your mind on computers, it seems."




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970205001417.21350A-100000>