From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Aug 21 20:52:01 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id UAA29727
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:52:01 -0700
Received: from misery.sdf.com (gw.sdf.com [204.191.196.33])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA29685
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:51:30 -0700
Received: by misery.sdf.com id <1080>; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:46:26 +0100
Date: 	Mon, 21 Aug 1995 20:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@misery.sdf.com>
To: Scott Mace <smace@crash.ops.neosoft.com>
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: equal cost ip forwarding
In-Reply-To: <199508212311.SAA01446@crash.ops.neosoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950821204550.2864B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 21 Aug 1995, Scott Mace wrote:

> > > Anyone working on or have patches for equal cost ip forwarding?
> > 
> > what's that?
> > One packet here, one packet there? etc?
> 
> Yah, say you have 2 p2p links, and you want the bandwidth spread
> across the 2.  I got the idea from digging through cornell gated...

  Everyone else calls this load-balancing or bonding.

Tom