From owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org  Thu Dec  5 04:51:30 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7D51BAAC4
 for <freebsd-sparc64@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  5 Dec 2019 04:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47T3GB3xKpz3Gt1
 for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Dec 2019 04:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31])
 by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E5B13D7B3;
 Thu,  5 Dec 2019 04:51:29 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 04:51:28 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Joe Kozak <dd.if.dev.zero.of.dev.null.count.1.bs.1g@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sparc64 and FreeBSD 13.0
Message-ID: <20191205045127.GA6422@lonesome.com>
References: <CAPyFy2CxrOLx9RtA9hA6ou7gb5d-uqvJjCSXVYOoojt37+s+9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPyFy2DJeHB+FdnagoVmxMwUGp92YMNSU9Kg7E4n-x55MUvFhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191203181148.GA24129@lonesome.com>
 <D91A6BEA-ED7B-4352-AC68-A0856158BEE3@distal.com>
 <20495159-605f-c0eb-bd26-4daaab2024a2@sorbs.net>
 <CAGuhNT3=fGkgEpHK066g-oQj+JUYfWPkYRee3tXG65zAN=bq_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK3Ucu6+kVpsuR-ZVHSURJe_32Dg6_kwRn69jyD-NxO=UsrL3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191205035843.GA3392@lonesome.com>
 <CAK3Ucu5jNm_HysV3rweR5f8PE1=DojFMvw9p4_WcZVP4dhM0hg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK3Ucu5jNm_HysV3rweR5f8PE1=DojFMvw9p4_WcZVP4dhM0hg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47T3GB3xKpz3Gt1
X-Spamd-Bar: -
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of linimon@lonesome.com has no SPF policy
 when checking 18.222.6.11) smtp.mailfrom=linimon@lonesome.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(-0.25)[ip: (0.02), ipnet: 18.220.0.0/14(0.11), asn: 16509(-1.31),
 country: US(-0.05)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lonesome.com];
 AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[11.6.222.18.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2];
 RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.220.0.0/14, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-sparc64>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:51:30 -0000

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:00:35PM -0600, Joe Kozak wrote:
> Is that for basic support in the compiler linker bits?

The latter.  It hasn't bitrotted *that* much.

I *think*.

mcl