From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 8 11:34:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0209116A4CE; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:34:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21DF43D4C; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:34:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pouet.in.mat.cc (pouet.in.mat.cc [193.30.224.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B700A24033; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:34:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:34:23 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Erwin Lansing , Trevor Johnson Message-ID: <0886AB566445FED5A62B4D5C@[192.168.1.5]> In-Reply-To: <20050308085504.GS86185@droso.net> References: <200503080804.j2884CHa064170@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050308085504.GS86185@droso.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0a5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/festival Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:34:33 -0000 +-Le 08/03/2005 09:55 +0100, Erwin Lansing a dit : | On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:04:12AM +0000, Trevor Johnson wrote: |> trevor 2005-03-08 08:04:12 UTC |> |> FreeBSD ports repository |> |> Modified files: |> audio/festival Makefile |> Log: |> Back out addition of PORTEPOCH by edwin. It is not needed. |> | Please backout this backout. PORTEPOCH can never decrease. It's ok to | disagree with the reasons why it was bumped, but that is water under the | bridge and should stay up. It cas be discussed, as the port is unbuildable as is :-) -- Mathieu Arnold