Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 14:27:30 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need some input re: named pipes Message-ID: <19971119142730.OZ52645@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199711142357.QAA18184@usr06.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Nov 14, 1997 23:57:07 %2B0000 References: <199711141434.JAA01323@dyson.iquest.net> <199711142357.QAA18184@usr06.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Terry Lambert wrote: > > Could anyone give me some feedback on an idea of making our pipe > code (fast) > used for named pipes? I don't think that it is hard > to implement, but > do people usually use the socket ioctl's for > named pipes? Many of those > would go-away when moving to the pipe > code. > Wouldn't this break X? Of course not. X is using sockets, not pipes. j@uriah 208% ls -l /tmp/.X11-unix/ total 0 srwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 0 Nov 14 00:02 X0= srwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 0 Nov 14 00:04 X1= These should be in /var/run, of course. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971119142730.OZ52645>