Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:45:12 -0700
From:      "Ronald F. Guilmette" <>
To:        Quartz <>
Subject:   Re: Copying memstick image to a USB (flash/thumb) drive
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

In message <>, you wrote:

>>      Why exactly is the "bs=10240" is there?  Wouldn't the default of 512
>>      do just as well?
>Modern systems can read and write far more than 512 bytes per operation. 
>Sticking with 512 would work perfectly fine, but you'd be imposing an 
>unnecessary bottleneck and the copy would be a lot slower overall. 
>Whether 10K is optimal or not depends on the exact hardware you're 
>messing with (it looks pretty low to me, I'd suggest more like 1M).

I agree.  And 10 kibibytes is probably quite a bit less than optimal.

I have filed the following PR:

Thank you for your reply.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>