Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:06:52 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: mike@reifenberger.com, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, tobez@tobez.org Subject: Re: 64bit integer problem? Message-ID: <52048.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1190182012.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> In-Reply-To: <20070918.170443.-1548242567.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20070918182508.V24397@fw.reifenberger.com> <46F0064C.3080702@uchicago.edu> <20070918220327.V25238@fw.reifenberger.com> <20070918.170443.-1548242567.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh: > We need to create TARGET_ARCH=armeb for your platform. > We've not done that. In case someone works on adding this target: Although "armeb" is used very commonly I think a more designated name of the target is "armbe". The letters "el" in "armel" are in reversed order to indicate the reversed byte order of this endianess. Björn P.S. It's just a thought. I don't want to discuss about the color of the bikeshed. Feel free to do whatever you want. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52048.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1190182012.squirrel>