Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Dec 1998 23:44:58 +0100
From:      Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de>
To:        freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ITK Support 
Message-ID:  <199812142244.XAA05201@peedub.muc.de>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 Dec 1998 19:35:44 +0100." <000101be26c7$64ed8e30$53cb08d4@hwart.teuto.de> 

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
"Martin Husemann" writes:
>Markus Döhr wrote:
>
>> Are there any problems with implementing active cards? I read something
>> about time critical things long time ago in a Linux list, but I'm not very
>> into this stuff...
>
>No, no real problems if (a) the interface to the card is documented, (b) the
>interface is reasonable and (c) the card behaves like the docs promise.
>

the real problem is that a lot of active cards require a CAPI interface,
which we do not have (yet). Implementing a CAPI in a reasonable manner
and interfacing it to the existing i4b structure is a problem which is
being worked on (I have to get this going to support the AVM B1).

---
Gary Jennejohn
Home - garyj@muc.de
Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812142244.XAA05201>